Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-tpc-l - [[Star-tpc-l] ] TPC Meeting Minutes

star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Star-tpc-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Richard Witt <witt AT usna.edu>
  • To: Star-tpc L <Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: [[Star-tpc-l] ] TPC Meeting Minutes
  • Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:59:35 -0400


Present: Alexei, Mathias, Jim, Emmy, Zhangbu, Frank, Gene, Yuri, Tommy, Grazyna, and myself


== Hardware
— most things going well
— several RDOs bad
— access tonight (primarily for sPHENIX), beam after midnight
— tried 111x111 last night, failed so returned to 56x56
— drift velocity has recovered (trending up toward 5.5 cm/us) since adding slightly more methane


== Electronics
— Tonko may be able to repair some boards today depending on schedule
— anything done will be reflected in the log book
    

== Software
— Run 22 p+p 500 SC
— waiting on new TPC alignment
— Emmy looking at mass difference between light nuclei and light anti-nuclei
— asymmetric effect of SC on charge signs is important to her analysis
— looked at difference in mass^2 for protons from isobar dataset 
— clear difference in mass^2 observed over pt which even diverges with increasing pt
— apply a correction based on assumption of inaccurate momentum measurement
— momentum inaccuracy taken to be proportional to momentum
— new correction works well out to about 2.5 GeV/c
— may need to look at dependence on Z position of the tracks
— another suggestion is to look at dependence on azimuthal position
— need someone to also look at other datasets to see if same effect is there 
— perhaps also look at luminosity dependencies 
— 

— TFG24d
— going forward with dE/dx calibration production from HLT farm in meantime 
— next is to go forward with new alignment and check other data samples
— Gene noted that calibration production usually comes after distortion corrections have been applied
— calibration production for fixed target could happen immediately
— other (non-FXT) sets will need distortion correction pass first

== AOB
— some discussion of increase in hit errors fro 2016 Au+Au 
— question of relative benefit attributable to increased errors vs inclusion of more noise
— increase in hit errors serves to include hit in pattern recognition during track finding
— but because errors are large, the tracks are not unduly distorted

Best Regards,
  Richard

Sent from my iPad
-- 
"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change
the world."

--Nelson Mandela

~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~
 Richard Witt, Professor of Physics     Phone (USNA): 410-293-6675
    United States Naval Academy         Email: witt AT usna.edu
~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~~~***~



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page