usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] FDR Flow-down help

From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
To: "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Sarah Demers <sarah.demers AT yale.edu>
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] FDR Flow-down help
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:37:54 -0400

Hello all,

Apologies for sending so many emails. Could you, to help address the flow-down question, prepare a few slides per deliverable on

-how do the specs related to physics gains, and why are those spec numbers good? (Usually a balance between physics gain and feasibility/cost.)
-if the spec performance is different than planned, how does that impact physics? (For LAr there is the Higgs mass peak plot for example. For trigger, I would imagine we're talking trigger acceptance. In muons there's the eta-phi coverage map Sarah showed, ... I'm guessing each TDR has a few useful plots.)

This request is already in the todo sheet sent earlier, but I wanted to add some more information.

Thanks,

Gustaaf

[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] FDR Flow-down help, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/05/2019