Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] February variance reports

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] February variance reports
  • Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 10:55:34 +0200


Hello all,

First, it would be very much appreciated if variance reports could be filled
in a timely way. The deadline to file these is the 23rd of the month and
having to run after people every month is a waste of our time. Please set a
reminder in your calendar.

A few comments about the February variance reports that have been filed:

-6.4, 6.4.2 and 6.4.3 are missing

-6.4.1: please say what fraction of the schedule variance is due to the rad
board delay (quantifying this is required), and also explain the other
sources - the UT Austin delay is only ~1/3 of the schedule variance. Please
pay attention and don’t say things that are manifestly wrong ("is driven by
Austin”).

-6.5: the 6.5.1 delay leaves $130k unexplained. I realize the other two are
each below $100k, but together they are above, so maybe a sentence that says
ELMB production and LVPS pre-production are delayed is useful, and then have
an impact statement saying there’s plenty of float for those?

-6.5.1 is good

-6.6: all reports look good to me

-6.8, 6.8.2 and 6.8.4 are missing

-6.8.3 is good

Thx

Gustaaf






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page