usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports
- From: Thomas Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu>
- To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
- Cc: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 08:48:14 -0400
This is done for muons.
Tom
===================
Tom Schwarz
Associate Professor
Department of Physics
University of Michigan
Office: 734-764-8941
Lab: 734-763-7805
===================
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 4:49 AM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hello all,-6.4.1 is still missing the SV-6.4.3 reports on a schedule variance when it’s supposed to report on a cost variance!! Can people please pay attention to what is actually asked? It’s spelled out explicitly!-6.6: I wonder if you shouldn’t plan on a BCP to delay CSM production - see below.-6.6.3: still > $100k unexplained…-6.6.4: shouldn’t you at least have a BCP to delay production if you already know pre-production is going to be a problem?Please fix today.ThxGustaafOn Jul 28, 2022, at 5:11 PM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
Hello all,
A follow-up, please keep in mind that these need to be finalized tomorrow, so please make sure the issues below are all addressed *today*!
-6.4.1 is still missing the SV
-6.4.2 seems fine
-6.4.3 is still missing
-6.6 is still missing
-6.6.3: maybe the delay due to substrates can be quantified?
-6.6.4 is still missing the SV
Thanks,
GustaafOn Jul 26, 2022, at 7:38 PM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
Hello all,
Here are my comments on the June VRs. Please make sure to get this done in the next few days.
Thx
Gustaaf
-6.4.1: thanks for the CV report, but the SV is missing
-6.4.2 is missing
-6.4.3 is missing
-6.6 is missing
-6.6.3: $110k in SV remains unexplained
-6.6.4 is missing the schedule variance explanation
-6.8* looks good
-6.10 looks fine
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 07/26/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 07/28/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 07/29/2022
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports, Thomas Schwarz, 07/29/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 07/29/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] June variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 07/28/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.