usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports
- From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
- To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:39:41 +0200
Thanks for the updates. For 6.4.1 I wouldn’t call $156k “modest,” but YMMV.
Now, we’re going to the next stage of formality for these. Once we’re past this stage, where I have reviewed and we have converged, please “submit” the VR. I will then approve them.
Here’s the list that still needs to be “submitted” for July:
6.4.*
6.6.3 and 6.6.5
6.8.*
6.10.2
Thanks,
Gustaaf
On Aug 25, 2022, at 11:29 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello all,A follow-up. Please act on these before the week-end!-6.4.1: no change yet - please make sure to either remove the cost text or amend it to explain the -$150k-6.8 is still missing.ThxGustaafOn Aug 23, 2022, at 11:53 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello all,Thanks for filling out the variance reports on time. A few comments below.Thanks,Gustaaf-6.4.1 in my view only cumulative schedule is required:
Threshold(s) Exceeded: Cumulative Schedule This may be a rounding effect, so it’s probably best to to report on this, but the positive $350k must be balanced by a negative $150k, so that would also need to be explained. (We have seen one case where something showed up red for one person but not the other - it may be browser-dependent…)-6.4.2/3 are ok. (I do suggest in the future to write something more polished than “there will be extra money”.)-6.5.3: Just FYI I’m not sure we will rebaseline non-COVID issues, so this variance may remain until the end of the project.-6.6 and 6.6.3 are fine-6.6.4: at the end of the corrective action I might add: “a BCP to address to likely delay to the production part of the schedule.” (to make clear the intention is not to “fix the past”)-6.6.5 looks good-6.8 is missing-6.8.3 and 6.10.2 look fine to me.
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/23/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/25/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/26/2022
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/30/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/26/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] July Variance Reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 08/25/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.