U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hi,

I think most people put in the effort profile by labor category.  I would certainly include that slide.

Best,

Gustaaf

On Feb 22, 2023, at 8:38 PM, Evans, Harold G. <hgevans AT indiana.edu> wrote:

Hi Stephanie,

Others should speak up as well - but my view of the review's charge is that the NSF wants to understand *changes* with respect to the MREFC start schedule. The L3s can certainly show plots from the cost books if that is helpful in illustrating those changes, but they certainly don't have to (re)motivate the baseline estimates.

Does that help?

Best  -  Hal

On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 17:51 +0000, Stephanie Majewski wrote:

This message was sent from a non-IU address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources.

Hi Gustaaf, Hal, (NSF L2 list in cc)

I mentioned this in our meeting on Monday, but there is very little on the schedule/effort/cost in the L3 talks (following the template). I asked the trigger L3s to include some information from the cost books in backup.

To address the scientific effort charge question below, I added a second effort slide “Effort Profile by Resource Category” in my L2 talk (see p.26):

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Obk6unMmxXAMu0bnvP1odQU_4AJ3eo47M4rvNYZhuNg/edit?usp=sharing

Especially for trigger, I felt it was important to include both this profile and the Effort by L4 since that has changed after retiring HTT.

I have not yet uploaded this to doc db - let me know if you would like me to modify this approach.

Stephanie

On Feb 22, 2023, at 8:23 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hello all,

A reminder that in the charge there are two questions related to scientific labor (see below).  If you haven’t done so yet, please make note of any evolution in scientific labor in the effort profile slide.  (BTW, our standard answer for tracking these contributions is that almost all tasks that have significant scientific labor also have significant paid labor.  (At FDR, only some tasks in HTT has < 50% costed labor hours.)

Best,

Gustaaf

1a.    How has the scope of uncosted scientific labor changed with the rebaselining, and what are the implications of these changes on the project scope, budget, schedule, and risk? 2b.    Has the scientific (uncosted) labor needs/expectation changed, and if so what are the potential impacts? Is the project utilizing a satisfactory means for managing, monitoring, and tracking uncosted labor contributions?

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2l3ics-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2l3ics-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2l3ics-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!AupbLvzUCanZ8U9QoxoPZaAZSOSXz3B7fZ2ehZprTabYc4ZtN3IjdmvA1GdBNdEZD-U9r4b0XNHU7pQvhbpAr6_eIq4J$

-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Hal Evans                        hgevans AT indiana.edu

           http://hgevans.pages.iu.edu/

 Tel: (812)856-3828                    Fax: (812)855-5533

 204 Swain Hall West               Indiana University

 727 E. Third St.                Bloomington, IN 47405

------------------------------------------------------------------------------