usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments
- From: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>
- To: "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 16:39:25 +0000
Hi Tom, I see in the scope contingency #7 (chamber batch 8) has a decision date of Jan-23 (in the past!). Maybe it is still a viable option, but then the date needs to be updated.
Hi Gustaaf, John, Stephanie,
In scope opportunity I see below – my concern is with the language for all three is that “to ensure project success” sure sounds like a red flag after we told them we can deliver 90% certainty! Shouldn’t it me more along the lines of “to significantly reduce risk” (or maybe even “to add functionality” if that is true?)
Cheers, Mike
From: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
On Behalf Of Gustaaf Brooijmans
_______________________________________________ |
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 02/23/2023
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments,
Michael Tuts, 02/23/2023
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments,
Stephanie Majewski, 02/23/2023
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments, Michael Tuts, 02/23/2023
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 02/23/2023
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments,
Stephanie Majewski, 02/23/2023
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Floats and scope contingency -- comments,
Michael Tuts, 02/23/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.