Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Some info from listening to CMS NSF Review

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>
  • Cc: "usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Some info from listening to CMS NSF Review
  • Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 08:40:30 -0500


So with 90% CL contingency, all L2 areas complete at > 90% CL.  I’m baffled...

On Mar 21, 2023, at 1:17 PM, Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net> wrote:

Hi All,
Since there are some common reviewers between the CMS and ATLAS review here are some information that the CMS reviewers will have seen where they might “compare and contrast” so maybe helpful for you. Since my attendance at the CMS review is a courtesy, please do not share this info widely.
 
Thanks, Mike
 
From Anders talk:
 
These couple of plots do not include their “external factors” (in our language “world events”)
<image001.png>
 
<image002.png>
 
 
<image004.png>
 
<image003.png>
 
 
 
<image005.png>
 
<image006.png>
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page