U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Mark Oreglia <oreglia AT uchicago.edu>]

this is fine with Tile...but it would seem that the scheduling needs to be done among the reviewers.

Sincerely,
Mark Oreglia

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mark Oreglia
Professor, Dept. of Physics
Deputy Dean for PSD Infrastructure
The University of Chicago,
The Enrico Fermi Institute

The University of Chicago         |  m-oreglia AT uchicago.edu
5640 S. Ellis Av                  |  Tel:   (773) 702-7446
Chicago, IL  60637-1433           |  Fax:   (773) 702-1914
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

On 4/13/2023 12:36 PM, Michael Tuts wrote:

Hi L2/L2D,

 

I had an exchange with Mark Coles regarding #4

 

 

So we should try and arrange a specific time when this subcommittee can drop into your breakout (just like the costs and schedule subcommittee stopping by) to address the QA/QC . I asked Mark if we could limit it – limit it to electronics like they said – so drop sMDTs and drop Trigger. He agreed about trigger, but not about sMDT. If we set aside 30min per subsystem during the breakout would that be sufficient to discuss the L3 QA/QC questions they have?

 

From Mark Coles: “I think you should include sMDT chambers in this plan, and maybe the L0Calo optical plant if there is something to say about this. George Angeli, who will focus on the QA/QC efforts, will likely be interested in knowing what is going on there. In our meeting yesterday, the panel expressed interest in knowing about QA/QC – especially impacts on vendors, and also about ATLAS’s plans for acceptance test of items delivered to CERN. I think you can skip the firmware.”

 

Mike

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l