U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello all,

Today’s follow-up:

-6.4, 6.4.2 look good, I have approved them

-6.4.3: technically, no cost variance explanation is needed (I know, it’s a 
bit confusing in IPD as the $ number is red).  I have approved it, but next 
time, only explain what’s needed.

-6.6.3: see our direct email exchange

We’re now just missing 6.4.1, 6.8 and 6.8.4.

Best,

Gustaaf


> On Apr 22, 2024, at 11:29, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Thanks to those who have already filed their variance reports.  Others 
> please do so soon.
> 
> In the meantime, here are some comments on those already filed:
> 
> -6.6.3: it looks like a report on the positive cost variance is also 
> needed, so I’ve unlocked it.  (Take the opportunity to fix the typos 
> please, it looks sloppy.)
> 
> -6.6.4 looks good, I have approved it
> 
> -6.6.5 looks good, I have approved it
> 
> -6.8.3 looks good, I have approved it
> 
> Best,
> 
> Gustaaf
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l