U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Stephanie Majewski <smajewsk AT uoregon.edu>]

Hi Gustaaf,

For 6.8.4 it would be more meaningful to exclude the Large Radius Tracking task groups from the critical path - I agree that the working schedule float extracted for this L3 is not sensible.

We had defined a schedule contingency task in 6.8.4.6 (EFT60590) that has a duration of 288 working days in the working schedule - this L4 is a good representative for the critical path of 6.8.4. Can we directly compare the 267 days needed from the simulation with this 288 wd ?

Thanks,

Stephanie

On Jul 9, 2024, at 4:58 PM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hello,

Some people asked for floats at L3.  Some of these don’t really make a lot of sense, see notes in the last column, but here they are.

Best,

Gustaaf

<2024-07-nsf-ipr-floats-v2.xlsx>

-- 
Stephanie Majewski
Professor of Physics
402 Willamette Hall
Institute for Fundamental Science
Department of Physics
University of Oregon
smajewsk AT uoregon.edu
pronouns: she/her/hers