Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] February VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu>
  • To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>, Junjie Zhu <junjie AT umich.edu>, "Hayden, Daniel" <haydend5 AT msu.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] February VRs
  • Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:30:15 -0400


Revised text should be there but we need Penka to push the submit button for us because my Cisco is broken. I'll probably have to spend an hour on the phone with the BNL help desk to fix it (the app is segfaulting after Penn forced me to update my OS).

Elliot

On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 1:31 PM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Thanks all for the updates.  We’re down to EF Tracking to wrap it up for the month.

On Mar 21, 2025, at 15:23, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:


Hello all,

An update as the muon VRs have been posted: 

-6.6 and 6.6.3 I have approved
-6.6.5: I have approved, but be careful next month since you say the BCP will take effect in February.

Best,

Gustaaf

On Mar 21, 2025, at 09:35, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:


Hello all,

Here are my comments on the VRs posted so far.

Best,

Gustaaf

---

-6.4: the SV is $2.1M and you only explain $1.4M.  This is a bit of an unfortunate feature of how this is presented, as only $300k of the missing $700k is NSF.  But $300k is a lot to leave out, so I’ve unlocked it.
-6.4.1 and 6.4.2 I’ve approved

-6.6, 6.6.3 and 6.6.5 are missing
-6.6.4 I have approved

-6.8.1: "As much other work as possible is being done in advance to also help with this, but cannot be statused as nominally those tasks come later in the schedule.” => please check with Penka, but you should be able to status this.  Penka et al will adjust links to deal with it.  In any case, it’s not something we should write in a VR, so I’ve unlocked this.
-6.8.2: I don’t think you can say "due to past errors in the RLS that have been corrected” without more explanation.  I’ve unlocked this.




--
Elliot Lipeles
Professor
Physics and Astronomy



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page