Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] March VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Cc: Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>, Reinhard Schwienhorst <reinhard.schwienhorst AT cern.ch>, Junjie Zhu <junjie AT umich.edu>, Thomas Andrew Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu>, Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu>
  • Subject: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] March VRs
  • Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:02:06 +0200


Hello all,

Thanks to those who filed their VRs in time. Comments on those below. We
are still missing 6.5.4, 6.6, 6.6.1, 6.6.3, 6.6.4.

-6.4 I have approved
-6.4.1 I have approved.
-6.4.3: 280k schedule variance has no impact? That seems hard to believe,
but if true it would be good to explain why there is no impact. I’ve
unlocked this.

-6.8.1 I have approved
-6.8.4: Please remove everything related to schedule variance since (as you
say) this is now below threshold. For the cost variance, the statement made
doesn’t align with having a positive $83k CV this month. I’ve unlocked this.

Best,

Gustaaf


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page