U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

[John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hi all,

        I have iterated my Risk slides and uploaded
v2 to the Risk Scrubbing agenda page at
https://indico.bnl.gov/event/6285/.  Comments welcome.
        Regards,
                John

On 6/22/19 4:54 PM, John Parsons wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>      I give below my notes from the risk scrubbing.
> While some of the comments are specific, many of them
> apply to all of our sections.  You also received comments
> from Hal, so look at those as well.
>
>      As the next step, we urgently need to get George
> everything he needs to run the simulation, so that we
> know where things stand.  To do so, he needs all the
> numbers, as well as the TaskID of the affected task
> (ie. where the MC would insert the branch is trials
> where a particular risk is realized) So work on finalizing
> these things first.  I would like to get all that to
> George by COB Monday.
>      In addition, we need to update various text,
> particularly in the Comments field.  That is (a bit)
> less urgent, since the descriptive text is not used in
> the MC.  I would like to go over any remaining issues
> or questions during our mtg on Tuesday, so try finish
> everything before then.
>      Regards,
>          John
>
> Notes from Risk Scrubbing
>
> General comment for everyone
>      - check the TaskID of the affected task, since some
> are out of date and need to be updated
>      - the "Increased complexity" task should have zero
> schedule impact.  The upper bound on the cost impact should
> be the labor cost of one iteration, as expressed in your
> baseline RLS
>      - update Comments field as necessary to explain
> the cost and schedule ranges used.  Keep in mind you
> should address BOTH the lower and upper bounds of these
> two ranges
>
> Add'l comments for Tim
> p. 7 - shift date to after start of MREFC
>
> p. 9 - Austin in title and summary
>
> p. 11 - 2% probability
>
> - combine 12 and 13, and rewrite (also p. 14) to make more general
> (ie. "CERN deliverables" or something like that)
>
> p. 14 - remove "erorrs/glitches"
>
> p. 15 - SMU in title and summary
>
> p. 16 - rephrase as "architecture", not just testing
>
>
>
> Add'l comments for Andy
> p. 1 - include system block diagram
>
> p. 2 - include delays only once
>      - put key personnel in prototype
>      - rephrase "mezzanine" (on a few slides)
>
> p. 3 - rephrase as extra iteration
>
> p. 4 - you mention variety of responses. Explain what you assume
> in Comments about number ranges
>
> p. 5 - rephrase as additional iteration of firmware
>
> p. 6 - "mezzanines"
>      - add redesign of sRTM to response
>      - could delete first sentence of Comments
>
> p. 7+8 - combine into one personnel risk
>
> p. 9 - remove additional iteration, since that covered elsewhere
>
>
> Add'l comments for John
> p. 5 - rephrase to avoid impression of people "doing nothing"
>
> p. 6 - rephrase as additional iteration

--
______________________________________________________________________

John Parsons
Nevis Labs,             Email: parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu
 Columbia University    Phone: (914) 591-2820
P.O. Box 137            Fax: (914) 591-8120
Irvington, NY 10533     WWW: 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nevis.columbia.edu_-7Eparsons_&d=DwIDaQ&c=aTOVZmpUfPKZuaG9NO7J7Mh6imZbfhL47t9CpZ-pCOw&r=DSVO6Re8kg14S-cQbkBC2zfSx6Yt2GtkcD3fTWOeyfXXTwIA3TKWV-phDKykUKDr&m=GYzilbjlW_rphjI3x-ORVzJcPIzT2wi84Hyk_nPFQOI&s=oTKnMyL3qU7cG7fnqz8Pn21Uo32asvnTu1E6_JdW3S0&e=
    

______________________________________________________________________