U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

["Ma, Hong" <hma AT bnl.gov>]

 

                I entered a few lines for the November VP for 6.4.5. The SPI of 0.83 is due to the delay in submission.

                I will talk to Penka about what to do with Penn’s past.

                6.4.4.2  (Sys Int) was undercharged last year because Hao was still mainly paid to work on Phase-I.

                We will see what we can do to catch up.

 

                Hong.

               

 

From: Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 3:49 PM
To: "usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] November CPR

 

 

Hello all,

 

                I just received the November CPR, which I attach.  Here are some

observations, and comparisons to October:

 

- overall, LAr went from 0.80 to 0.85 at L2, so moving in the right

direction.  However, some of this came from the DOE BCP, and in

particular moving Hao finally to an updated schedule.  Many (most) of

the other L3s and L4s stayed roughly as bad as October

 

6.4.1 - Tim remains the only L3 above the 0.90 SPI limit (moving from

0.91 to 0.92) and therefore does not require a variance report  (we will

see if that changes next month given the delay in the COLUTAv3 chip

delivery)

 

6.4.2 - FEB2 remains slightly behind (moved from 0.85 to 0.86, so not

far from 0.90 cutoff)

 

6.4.3 - still very board, moved from 0.41 to 0.43.  Small overall

improvement was due to f/w at U Az, that went from 0.40 to 0.48, while

h/w at SBU remains at 0.41 (and becomes new "owner" of lowest SPI!)

 

6.4.4 - Hao's BCP made big difference. BE Integ. moved from 0.67 to

0.90. However, while FEB2 Integ. moved significantly (from 0.38 to

0.53), the move was not nearly enough to get back close to "on schedule"

 

6.4.5 - improved a bit, moving from 0.77 to 0.83, presumably due to ALFE

submission in November.

               

                While we are not yet tracking CPI as closely as SPI, a few comments

about CPIs are also in order:

 

6.4.1 - Austin and SMU are underspent by ~30%

 

6.4.3 - U Az is overspent by ~25% (though the total cost so far is modest)

 

6.4.4 - Syst. Integ. is WAY underspent! (factor of 5.68!!)  Hao/Hong,

please check what is going on there, since it seems things are not being

charged properly

 

6.4.5 - from past history, U Penn is credited with $86.6k of work but

they only charged 18.5k.  Hong, can you talk with Penka to see what we

should do about the reporting of this, since it would be preferable to

not keep carrying it along in all reports through the lifetime of the

project

 

                Everyone except Tim will need to prepare a variance report for

November.  (Keep in mind that the PO decided for October to only have

variance reports at L2, so you don't need to do one for October; I will

complete the October L2 variance report tomorrow.)

                Regards,

                                John

--

______________________________________________________________________

 

John Parsons

Nevis Labs,                          Email: parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu

  Columbia University      Phone: (914) 591-2820

P.O. Box 137                       Fax: (914) 591-8120

Irvington, NY 10533         WWW: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nevis.columbia.edu_-7Eparsons_&d=DwICaQ&c=aTOVZmpUfPKZuaG9NO7J7Mh6imZbfhL47t9CpZ-pCOw&r=DSVO6Re8kg14S-cQbkBC2zfSx6Yt2GtkcD3fTWOeyfXXTwIA3TKWV-phDKykUKDr&m=ufJMAiPhG84YnoxzKamWDHvvP_z2Uf7tUJXc87RKzQA&s=uJ62TtgV1dRUGc8MMEGubLO4KOICznTaq82fWRJHy10&e=                

 

______________________________________________________________________