U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

[John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Feedback from Gustaaf on the VRs.  Can Tim and Andy please make the 
appropriate modifications?  (as will I)


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] February variance reports
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:11:33 +0200
From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov


Hello all,

A quick follow-up before Mike submits the report tomorrow:


-6.4: the explanation needs to quantify which fraction of the variance 
is due to each source.
-6.4.1: the issues have not been addressed.  This will *not* satisfy 
NSF, and it does not satisfy us.
-6.4.2 is fine
-6.4.3: I’m not sure the first two sentences of the corrective action 
are still relevant

-6.8, 6.8.2 and 6.8.4 are now 1 week late, and this is unacceptable 
given that we need to file with NSF tomorrow!

> On Mar 28, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> 
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> First, it would be very much appreciated if variance reports could be filled 
> in a timely way.  The deadline to file these is the 23rd of the month and 
> having to run after people every month is a waste of our time.  Please set a 
> reminder in your calendar.
>
> A few comments about the February variance reports that have been filed:
>
> -6.4, 6.4.2 and 6.4.3 are missing
>
> -6.4.1: please say what fraction of the schedule variance is due to the rad board 
> delay (quantifying this is required), and also explain the other sources - the UT 
> Austin delay is only ~1/3 of the schedule variance.  Please pay attention and 
> don’t say things that are manifestly wrong ("is driven by Austin”).
>
> -6.5: the 6.5.1 delay leaves $130k unexplained.  I realize the other two are 
> each below $100k, but together they are above, so maybe a sentence that says 
> ELMB production and LVPS pre-production are delayed is useful, and then have 
> an impact statement saying there’s plenty of float for those?
>
> -6.5.1 is good
>
> -6.6: all reports look good to me
>
> -6.8, 6.8.2 and 6.8.4 are missing
>
> -6.8.3 is good
>
> Thx
>
> Gustaaf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l