Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] weekly mtg (at slightly shifted time)

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>
  • To: John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] weekly mtg (at slightly shifted time)
  • Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:32:16 -0400

Those delays had considerable overlap with each other, so adding is not accurate. For instance, much of the time we were waiting for zynqs, we were also waiting for Lasp tests/specs.


On Sun, Mar 26, 2023, 12:19 PM John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hi Andy,

        We have some issue getting a consistent story on the SRTM delays:

on p. 17, you say these 2 things:

"COVID caused ~9 months of delay in progress on hardware and firmware
development (reduced efficiency of remote work), as well as ~12 month
delay in feedback from LASP specs / testing"

"Supply chain disruptions caused ~8 month delay in availability of Zynq
FPGAs needed for assembly of v1.5 sRTMs"

        If I add those together, I would end up with a total "World Events"
delay of about 29 months.  With 20 working days per month, this would be
29*20 = 580 working days.  Yet, in my L2 talk I give a range of 324-356
days, since that is what I find adding up the delays from the 4 "COVID
BCPs".  So, I think the COVID BCP preparations did NOT count the LASP
delays as COVID-related.  In which case, we need to be consistent now
and not count them that way.

        Regards,
                John

On 3/26/23 10:42 AM, Ma, Hong wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
>                  A few comments on the slides:
>
> Slide 5: “Deliverable” refers to the US deliverable, but the description is for the whole BE system.  Add a bullet on what US will deliver?
>
> Slide 7:  The table as provided in the template is meant to show the US responsibilities of the US deliverables.  I think you want to show US will deliver 100% of sRTM.   Then the first column should be sRTM, not LASP.       I suppose Annecy and CPPM are still considered international partner since LASP and sTRM are closely coupled, even though there is no percentage for them.
>
> Slide 9: “Will submit PCB for sRTM v2 in March 2023”.   Will it be submitted by the time of the review?   If sRTM v2 is the Prototype, it may be helpful to point out too.
>                  “Will adapt to lower…” is it already in the rebaseline?
>
> Slide 18: In another email thread on “Milestone date evolution”, John Hobbs pointed out the “ delays waiting for the LASP ”.   Should that be mentioned here?   i.e., risk of dependency on external partner was partially realized.
>
>                  Best,
>
>                  Hong.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>
> Date: Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 11:27 AM
> To: Parsons, John <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
> Cc: usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] weekly mtg (at slightly shifted time)
> I've added a draft of my talk here: (and on the agenda page)
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MCdLnGynBkoLT498P19bdY7UjZnBHQyhEXkebIMqnug/edit?usp=sharing__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!CGc_zjydB7rAd952GBW3h3jUK3Arro71oWu1F-j-Gl71Zlew8HSMMzWFSGOkhmyZdpslvJhviXWc318Frjp9el_sBOdm85eRhEF9d0Yc$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MCdLnGynBkoLT498P19bdY7UjZnBHQyhEXkebIMqnug/edit?usp=sharing__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!CGc_zjydB7rAd952GBW3h3jUK3Arro71oWu1F-j-Gl71Zlew8HSMMzWFSGOkhmyZdpslvJhviXWc318Frjp9el_sBOdm85eRhEF9d0Yc$>
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.bnl.gov_mailman_listinfo_usatlas-2Dhllhc-2Dlartl2l3-2Dl&d=DwIDaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=y4qQBOsjsdgJNx-_8SvpS9786vHE4GOddPXp1ozJgWc&m=tylk89wuHKCfHjaw15cTKV8U7x49-oZVMfvH4UmNwq_Z67glC5EjWemB4gRXiYbv&s=kCTJ95mNB_cdRW0KO62by4W_xQzkZcT_5TOoGD_fXQY&e=
>

--
______________________________________________________________________

John Parsons
Nevis Labs,             Email: parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu
  Columbia University   Phone: (914) 591-2820
P.O. Box 137            Fax: (914) 591-8120
Irvington, NY 10533     WWW: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nevis.columbia.edu_-7Eparsons_&d=DwIDaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=y4qQBOsjsdgJNx-_8SvpS9786vHE4GOddPXp1ozJgWc&m=tylk89wuHKCfHjaw15cTKV8U7x49-oZVMfvH4UmNwq_Z67glC5EjWemB4gRXiYbv&s=rPkn3K35PlsUP1huhFBefq475VFfQqm19ztpKC67Exk&e=         

______________________________________________________________________



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page