U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

[John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

It is also variance time!


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] March variance reports comments
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:07:16 +0200
From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
CC: Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, Schwienhorst, Reinhard 
<schwier AT msu.edu>, Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>


Hello all,

Here are some comments on the March variance reports.

Best,

Gustaaf

-6.4 is missing
-6.4.1: looks good, approved
-6.4.2/3 are missing

-6.5, 6.5.3 look good, approved
-6.5.4.1 looks good but needs to be submitted for me to approve

-6.6 is missing
-6.6.1: about $300k of schedule variance is unexplained in the 
explanation, but then shows up in impact.  I’ll unlock so you can add a 
sentence.
-6.6.3: looks good, approved
-6.6.4 is missing
-6.6.5: looks good, approved

-6.8 is missing
-6.8.3: looks good, approved
-6.8.4: looks good, approved, but one question: in the agile world, you 
should be able to make the GNN change without incurring a schedule 
penalty, no?

-6.10.2 is missing

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l