Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] Fwd: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] May VRs

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Timothy Robert Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>
  • To: John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>, "usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] Fwd: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] May VRs
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:14:14 +0000

Hi John,

 

Thanks for the reminder. It’s done.

 

Best, Tim

 

From: Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 at 3:50 PM
To: usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] Fwd: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] May VRs

       
A reminder for Tim and me (Andy is already done) that the VRs for May
are due very soon.  Also, take note of Gustaaf's point that these VRs in
particular will be discussed at the IPR in July, so we should make sure
they are clear, etc.

Tim, let me know when you have submitted yours.

        Thanks,
                John


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] May VRs
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:59:20 +0300
From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
To: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov


Hello all,

A reminder that the May VRs are due soon.  Keep in mind that the May
working schedule is our basis for the July review, so it’s crucial to
fully understand the variances.  This will have to go into your slides.

Many are already posted (thanks!), here are some comments:

-6.4.3 looks good, I have approved it

-6.5.4: I don’t understand this: any pre-rebaselining variance would
have been zeroed out, and in fact there is no variance at Columbia.  I
have unlocked this.

-6.6.3: the SV report looks fine, but CV is missing, so I have unlocked
this.

-6.6.4: "The schedule variance of $866k is mostly due to delays in the
schedule. We are set to enter full production now, so are hit with a
variance of roughly $720k.” This basically says there is a schedule
variance because there is a schedule variance.  Please say something
about the actual source.  (I guess it’s purchase of comonents…)  I have
unlocked this.

-6.6.5: looks good but you forgot to submit.  (BTW, I think you meant
“remainder” rather than “reminder”)

-6.8 looks good and I have approved.
-6.8.3: nice to see a $100k positive variance this month.  I approved
the text.

Best,

Gustaaf
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page