ECCE Public Announcements

["Zisis Papandreou" <Zisis.Papandreou AT uregina.ca>]

Hi folks:

 

I did a 1st pass through the paper, up to and including section 4.5.  I will look more after Monday, when the other sections are ready. (Including 4.7, ...)

 

Content looks good and overall the sections read well.

 

Rachel and Bill, I have annotated a version I downloaded on May 6, at 16:24 CST.  My comments are here:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/8rdj9jrisqtrh0x/ecce_paper_phys_2022_02_May6-1624CST_zp.pdf?dl=0

 

If it is convenient -- and does not add confusion -- I can enter most of those in Overleaf.  Please advise.

 

Cheers, Zisis...

 

Dr. Zisis Papandreou

Head, Department of Physics

Professor of Physics, Ph.D, P.Phys.

---------------------------------------------------------

Department of Physics   

University of Regina        

3737 Wascana Parkway

Regina, SK  S4S 0A2     CANADA

 

Phone: (306) 585-5379

Fax: (306) 585-5659

Email:  zisis AT uregina.ca

Website: https://www.uregina.ca/science/physics/people/faculty-research/zisis-papandreou/

>>> "Wenliang (Bill) Li" <billlee AT jlab.org> 05/03/2022, 12:01 PM >>>

Dear all, 

This email will provide a timeline regarding the complication and internal review of the Exclusive, Diffractive & Tagging summary paper.

Here we would like to thank the review team for leading the internal group review: G. Huber, Z. Papandreou, J. Roche, A. Schmidt,

 

The plan is as the following:

By tomorrow (May 4) at 10:00 am EDT, Sections 1, 2, and 4 (except 4.6) will be ready for the internal group review.

By Monday (May 9) at 10:00 am EDT, Sections 3, 4.6, and 6 will be ready for the internal group review.

Monday (May 9), we will present our paper at the ECCE bi-weekly meeting to the consortium. 

Friday (May 13), the paper will be ready for comments from the consortium.

 

Please let us if you have any suggestions or comments on this plan.

 

Greatly appreciate the individuals who worked hard on polishing the studies, we would like to emphasize the importance of the common standard on how we present our plots.

 

For important key figures, we must polish them to the following standard:

https://nbviewer.org/github/ECCE-EIC/tutorials/blob/master/ECCEStyle/ECCEStyle-Python.ipynb

 

I also included a few great examples in the attachment. We don't want to ask everyone to use the same template, please preserve a few common features when generating the key plot which includes: the ECCE label, scattering configuration, and readable axis labels.

 

Please consider using the following style script to standardize the font or configuration (download them to your local directory):

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ECCE-EIC/macros/master/common/ECCEStyle.C

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ECCE-EIC/macros/master/common/ECCEStyle.h

 

To use them, please you can use the following root macro command to trigger the style:

 

    gInterpreter->Declare("""#include \"ECCEStyle.C\"""");

    gInterpreter->ProcessLine("SetECCEStyle()");

 

The ECCE label can be generated with the following TLegend example:

 

    auto legend1 = new TLegend(.35,.75,.65,.93);
    gStyle->SetLegendBorderSize(0);
    legend1->AddEntry("","#it{#bf{ECCE}} Simulation","");
    legend1->AddEntry("","e+p 18+275 GeV","");

 

For the intermediary plots, please remove the overhead labels and reduce the white space on the plot. Please also double-check the bin sizes: choppy-looking plots should be re-binned to show a smoother shape.

 

We would like to ask the interviewer to pay special attention to figure/plot quality.

 

Finally, the WG has decided on the author list strategy (by vote). Our summary paper will first list all students and postdocs in alphabetical order, followed by all members of the WG in alphabetical order, then the rest of the consortium in alphabetical order.

 

Many thanks

Bill on behalf of Exclusive, Diff & Tagg WG