eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: ePIC pfRICH mailing list
List archive
- From: "Tu, Zhoudunming" <zhoudunming AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Ullrich, Thomas S" <ullrich AT bnl.gov>, "eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] on the upper p limit
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:17:05 +0000
Hi Thomas, all,
This is a nice plot, and 7 GeV/c was also my conclusion last week. I assume you generated these plots from PYTHIA 8, as I don’t see this in YR.
The first plot I would produce is the Fig. 3.4 in ATHENA proposal on the pi/e ratio, after some kind of scattered electron identification.
A little bit update for everyone. Unfortunately the official October campaign, only eicrecon was used for DIS events, which are basically not usable for our purposes. Efficiency is 0.4% and the bug was about to be fixed. Today at 2pm in our Simqa meeting, I’ll bring this up and we might need to run Juggler again.
So my plan is to focus on DIS first, then more complicated events.
Kong
From:
Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Thomas Ullrich via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov> Hi All, |
-
[Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] on the upper p limit,
Thomas Ullrich, 11/09/2022
- Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] on the upper p limit, Kiselev, Alexander, 11/09/2022
-
Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] on the upper p limit,
Tu, Zhoudunming, 11/10/2022
- Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] on the upper p limit, Thomas Ullrich, 11/10/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.