Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

eic-projdet-pfrich-l - Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] Release of Draft pfRICH CDR

eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: ePIC pfRICH mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Brian Page <bpage AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: "eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] Release of Draft pfRICH CDR
  • Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:31:33 -0400

Hi Brian, editors,
  This is a really nice document.  A few broader comments, mostly on closing the loop of the argument:

Section 3.2 on Particle Occupancy
   The section starts off with the motivation 
"to understand any potential degradation in PID capability" but it never says whether
the distances at high inelasticity or in a jet do lead to a degradation, or not.  Is there
anything we can say about whether the delta-R shown are acceptable?

Section 5.1:
  The section starts off with the statement that the electromagnetic calorimeter can
" no longer be used efficiently" for "(p < 5 GeV/c)" for electron identification.  Then it concludes
that the pfRICH can provide good pion suppression for "p < 2 GeV/c", and talks a bit
about extending higher with a loss of efficiency.  Is the gap between 2 and 5 GeV/c 
a major or minor issue?

Some more minor things:
  I think on p. 39 either drop the "square of" in "square of the saturated angle" or drop the sqrt symbol.
    same paragraph: "demonstrate"->"demonstrated"

  On p. 42-43 you talk about clock distribution, and end with etc. This sentence might
     raise undue alarm, such as "Is this really going to introduce an independent jitter per 
     channel that allows you to do 1/sqrt(n)?"





On Mar 22, 2023, at 9:57 PM, Page, Brian via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Greetings Colleagues,

 

As was discussed in the meeting this morning, we are releasing a draft version of the pfRICH CDR to this list for review and comment. We kindly ask that everyone have a look and send their feedback to the editors (Alexander, Alex J., Kong, Thomas, and myself) within 1 week. We will then incorporate changes and release the CDR to the full collaboration.

We would also like to take this time to thank everyone who contributed to the pfRICH effort over the last ~6 months. This CDR represents a truly impressive amount of work by many people covering all aspects of the detector design and validation.

Thank you.

Brian - for the editors

 

 

 

<pfRICH_CDR_v1.0.pdf>_______________________________________________
Eic-projdet-pfrich-l mailing list
Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/eic-projdet-pfrich-l

--
He/Him/His
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work hours.
James C Dunlop Ph.: (631) 344-7781                       
Building 510A         Cell: (631)316-8153
P.O. Box 5000                      
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, NY 11973
dunlop AT bnl.gov












Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page