ePIC pfRICH mailing list

["Kiselev, Alexander" <ayk AT bnl.gov>]

  Thank you Sean,

  So, if we consider trapeziodal pfRICH tiles fitting into a 140mm x 140mm footprint, I conclude that (1) a horizontal travel is sufficient for a scan in one go, while (2) in a vertical travel we have only 60mm (while we need >70mm, to perform one complete scan in two passes). 

  By the way, 18mm diameter is what, precisely? An uncollimated beam size (then matching the opening in the integrating sphere)? This effectively reduces the vertical travel by a point when the table starts obscuring the integrating sphere opening, right?

  Cheers,

    Alexander.

---

From: Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Stoll, Sean via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 4:27 PM
To: Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] Hitachi U3210 sample compartment measurements

 

Per our discussion today, here is a slide with some Hitachi U3210 sample compartment measurements.

 

Sean

 

From: Eic-projdet-pfrich-l <eic-projdet-pfrich-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Kiselev, Alexander via Eic-projdet-pfrich-l
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2023 12:04 PM
To: eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: [Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] pfRICH meeting

 

 

 

  meeting time!