ePIC pfRICH mailing list

["Kim, Jihee" <jkim11 AT bnl.gov>]

Dear Charles,

Thank you very much for your valuable comments and suggestions. I have incorporated your feedback, and please find the updated version attached.

Dear All,

Please find attached the updated abstract draft. I would greatly appreciate any further comments or suggestions you may have.

Thank you very much for your time and support.

Best regards,
Jihee

---

From: Charles Joseph Naim <charlesjoseph.naim AT stonybrook.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2026 7:16 PM
To: Kim, Jihee <jkim11 AT bnl.gov>
Cc: eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov <eic-projdet-pfrich-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Eic-projdet-pfrich-l] ] Abstract for DIS2026

 

Hi Jihee, Thanks a lot for your nice abstract. I have a few comments and suggestions: L2: you might consider replacing platform with facility. L3–4: it could be helpful to introduce the ePIC detector immediately after the EIC, and to state early

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

 

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Jihee,

Thanks a lot for your nice abstract. I have a few comments and suggestions:

• L2: you might consider replacing platform with facility.

• L3–4: it could be helpful to introduce the ePIC detector immediately after the EIC, and to state early on the role of the pfRICH as a PID detector in the electron-going (backward) region, rather than introducing it later.

• L3–5: I would probably avoid focusing exclusively on “exploring the properties of gluons in nucleons and nuclei”, as the EIC physics program is much broader.

• L5–6: the reference to the White Paper does not seem essential here and could be removed to keep the abstract more concise.

• L15–18: the description of the pfRICH layout could likely be made more succinct, with some geometrical details condensed.

• L19–24: it might be useful to emphasize earlier what is actually presented in the talk, in particular:

  • mirror reflectivity and uniformity measurements,

  • HRPPD performance and characterization, including magnetic-field studies.
    At present, these points appear relatively late in the abstract.

Overall, the abstract could benefit from a tighter focus on mirror performance and HRPPD studies, with just enough detector context for a DIS audience.

Thanks a lot,
Charles

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:50 PM Kim, Jihee <jkim11 AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear All,

I would like to submit an abstract on mirror evaluation efforts and preliminary results from the HRPPD magnetic-field performance study for the WG6 Current Upgrades and Future Experiments session at DIS2026.

Please find the abstract draft attached, and I would greatly appreciate any comments or suggestions you may have. Thank you!

Best regards,
Jihee

--

———————————————————————— 

Dr. Charles-Joseph Naïm

Research associate

Center for Frontiers in Nuclear Science (CFNS)

Stony Brook University
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA
Office C-117

Phone: +1 347 273 0887

Email: charlesjoseph.naim AT stonybrook.edu

     cnaim AT bnl.gov

Zoom ID: 391 825 8156 (pin: 1643)

———————————————————————— 

Attachment: DIS_2026_abstract_JKIM_v2.pdf
Description: DIS_2026_abstract_JKIM_v2.pdf