epic-backward-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Epic-backward-hcal-l mailing list
List archive
[[Epic-backward-hcal-l] ] Projections and dimuon benchmark
- From: Leszek Kosarzewski <leszek.kosarzewski AT gmail.com>
- To: "Brandenburg, Daniel via Epic-backward-hcal-l" <epic-backward-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: Sieczczyński Michał (STUD) <michal.sieczczynski.stud AT pw.edu.pl>
- Subject: [[Epic-backward-hcal-l] ] Projections and dimuon benchmark
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 15:46:37 +0200
Dear Colleagues Here are the work in progress codes for the dimuon photoproduction benchmark: https: //github. com/eic/detector_benchmarks/blob/0b2475c5c8fb42c88dc322a65102cb04a5ea4f01/benchmarks/nhcal_dimuon_fotoproduction/scripts/dimuon_fotoproduction_analysis. cxx#L456
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear Colleagues
Here are the work in progress codes for the dimuon photoproduction benchmark:
With the current geometry we can make projections to nHCal (ID=113) and it's 2 projection surfaces (approximate positions):
surface=1 // the front surface at -395 cm
surface=2 // inner surface at -410 cm
There are local momentum vectors available. We are now working on selecting reconstructed hits in a certain distance from a straight line along the projection and momentum vector. In principle we can use other trajectory models or even ask Reco/Tracking group to add more surfaces for projections.
The full connection in the association chain was missing and we had to use Track id to make the full matching eg:
MCparticle -> ReconstructedParticle -> Track <--id--> Track <-- TrackSegment -> projection (TrackPoint at nHCal)
However, it could be that the Track->TrackSegment association is available now.
We based it on Derek's macro:
Best regards, Leszek
- [[Epic-backward-hcal-l] ] Projections and dimuon benchmark, Leszek Kosarzewski, 09/25/2025
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.