NPPS Leadership Team

[Alexander Kiselev <kisselev AT mail.desy.de>]

  this week I can make it almost any time on Wednesday ...

On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Torre Wenaus via Phys-npps-mgmt-l wrote:

> ...unless we get objections because of the RHIC S&T review conflict. How 
> about Wed 12:30? Non-NPs may be excused ;-)
> https://indico.bnl.gov/event/6365/
>   Torre
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:43 PM Torre Wenaus <wenaus AT gmail.com> wrote:
>       Thanks a lot Paul. Friday doesn't work so let's have this discussion 
> Wed 11am. Group meeting will remain Friday 10am.   Torre
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:48 PM Paul James Laycock via Phys-npps-mgmt-l 
> <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>       Hi (mainly for Torre),
>               The discussion to arrive at a coherent proposal for EIC was 
> postponed until next week, where the assumption is that we'll
>       have another meeting next Friday @ 10am EDT.  There is a hard cutoff at 
> midday.  My view was that there are two proposals:
>
>       Chris: use fun4All as-is but make improvements that anyway make sense 
> for sPhenix
>       Alexander: interface with Jana as he showed with EicRoot in ~10 days. 
>
>               Therefore the question to focus on is what is the extra work 
> required to bridge the difference.  Obviously it's good to
>       document for the workshop the work that Chris would see as being needed 
> as it demonstrates willingness to collaborate and that
>       there is real work involved, but discussion between us probably needs 
> to focus on quantification of the delta.
>
>               Cheers
>
>                       Paul
>
>       P.S.  Chris and Alexander can feel free to beat me up :)
>
>       _______________________________________________
>       Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
>       Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>       https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l