Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

phys-npps-mgmt-l - Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] LSST Reps visit to BNL in November

phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: NPPS Leadership Team

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Paul James Laycock <paul.james.laycock AT cern.ch>
  • To: Alexei Klimentov <Alexei.Klimentov AT cern.ch>
  • Cc: "jlauret AT bnl.gov" <jlauret AT bnl.gov>, NPPS leadership team <Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] LSST Reps visit to BNL in November
  • Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 04:05:30 +0000

Hi Alexei,
Sorry for the slow reply.

For Belle II, it’s fair to say that we have some experience with
(Belle)DIRAC (Sergey and Ruslan) and will be integrating Dirac with Rucio in
the coming months, work that will benefit greatly from hiring a core Rucio
developer. CDB is important and the link with HSF CWP paper on best
practice. Brett covered the DUNE synergies and points very well already.

My only other point would be Jupyter. Thanks to SDCC colleagues, we
used the Jupyterlab portal at BNL for a Belle II summer school this year and
it was well-received. Belle II and its python-based, declarative analysis
code is really a poster child for using jupyter, there is a lot of focus on
this for EIC as well. I’m sure Eric will mention this too. I remember from
this year’s HOW workshop that LSST is very interested and active in using
jupyter as analysis portal.

Cheers

Paul


> On Oct 31, 2019, at 05:02, Alexei Klimentov via Phys-npps-mgmt-l
> <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Thanks for comments/suggestions, I think all of them are good to add,
> especially synergy in HPC, Data Carousel, DDM and CDB, I personally also
> like Chris suggestions about analysis, I assume it will be interesting to
> LSST. BTW, do we have an expert among NP and PP in Kubernetes ?
> I’ll try to send you my slides by beg of the next week for comments
>
> Thanks again, Alexei
>
>
>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 17:53, Jerome LAURET <jlauret AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Probably all of the above (or in this case below :-) ).
>> HPC synergies are still possible.
>>
>> It is not clear if there are talk slots (and who would be giving
>> such talk) for other activities but as noted by Brett, condition DB is
>> a strength developed over many years. I doubt detector simulation is a
>> re-usable skill / knowledge across experiments but the toolkit aspect
>> could.
>>
>> On 2019-10-30 11:25, Alexei Klimentov wrote:
>>> I am not sure what should I highlight for STAR (may be again HPC, cloud
>>> computing, data carousel ?),
>>
>> --
>> ,,,,,
>> ( o o )
>> --m---U---m--
>> Jerome
>> <he-him-his>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
> Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page