Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

phys-npps-mgmt-l - Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] LSST Reps visit to BNL in November

phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: NPPS Leadership Team

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Alexei Klimentov <alexei.klimentov AT cern.ch>
  • To: NPPS leadership team <Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Jerome LAURET <jlauret AT bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Phys-npps-mgmt-l] LSST Reps visit to BNL in November
  • Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 19:40:46 +0100

Draft slides are attached

Attachment: NPPS_Nov2019.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document



> On 6 Nov 2019, at 15:17, Alexei Klimentov <Alexei.Klimentov AT cern.ch> wrote:
>
> Draft agenda is attached, I’ll send my slides later today
>
> <Agenda of LSST visit 7-8 Nov.pdf>
>
>> On 1 Nov 2019, at 05:05, Paul James Laycock <paul.james.laycock AT cern.ch>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexei,
>> Sorry for the slow reply.
>>
>> For Belle II, it’s fair to say that we have some experience with
>> (Belle)DIRAC (Sergey and Ruslan) and will be integrating Dirac with Rucio
>> in the coming months, work that will benefit greatly from hiring a core
>> Rucio developer. CDB is important and the link with HSF CWP paper on best
>> practice. Brett covered the DUNE synergies and points very well already.
>>
>> My only other point would be Jupyter. Thanks to SDCC colleagues, we
>> used the Jupyterlab portal at BNL for a Belle II summer school this year
>> and it was well-received. Belle II and its python-based, declarative
>> analysis code is really a poster child for using jupyter, there is a lot
>> of focus on this for EIC as well. I’m sure Eric will mention this too. I
>> remember from this year’s HOW workshop that LSST is very interested and
>> active in using jupyter as analysis portal.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 31, 2019, at 05:02, Alexei Klimentov via Phys-npps-mgmt-l
>>> <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Thanks for comments/suggestions, I think all of them are good to add,
>>> especially synergy in HPC, Data Carousel, DDM and CDB, I personally also
>>> like Chris suggestions about analysis, I assume it will be interesting to
>>> LSST. BTW, do we have an expert among NP and PP in Kubernetes ?
>>> I’ll try to send you my slides by beg of the next week for comments
>>>
>>> Thanks again, Alexei
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 17:53, Jerome LAURET <jlauret AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Probably all of the above (or in this case below :-) ).
>>>> HPC synergies are still possible.
>>>>
>>>> It is not clear if there are talk slots (and who would be giving
>>>> such talk) for other activities but as noted by Brett, condition DB is
>>>> a strength developed over many years. I doubt detector simulation is a
>>>> re-usable skill / knowledge across experiments but the toolkit aspect
>>>> could.
>>>>
>>>> On 2019-10-30 11:25, Alexei Klimentov wrote:
>>>>> I am not sure what should I highlight for STAR (may be again HPC, cloud
>>>>> computing, data carousel ?),
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ,,,,,
>>>> ( o o )
>>>> --m---U---m--
>>>> Jerome
>>>> <he-him-his>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
>>> Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l
>>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page