NPPS Leadership Team

[Alexei Klimentov <alexei.klimentov AT cern.ch>]

Draft slides are attached

Attachment: NPPS_Nov2019.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

> On 6 Nov 2019, at 15:17, Alexei Klimentov <Alexei.Klimentov AT cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> Draft agenda is attached, I’ll send my slides later today
> 
> <Agenda of LSST visit 7-8 Nov.pdf>
> 
>> On 1 Nov 2019, at 05:05, Paul James Laycock <paul.james.laycock AT cern.ch> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Alexei,
>>      Sorry for the slow reply.
>> 
>>      For Belle II, it’s fair to say that we have some experience with 
>> (Belle)DIRAC (Sergey and Ruslan) and will be integrating Dirac with Rucio 
>> in the coming months, work that will benefit greatly from hiring a core 
>> Rucio developer.  CDB is important and the link with HSF CWP paper on best 
>> practice.  Brett covered the DUNE synergies and points very well already.
>> 
>>      My only other point would be Jupyter.  Thanks to SDCC colleagues, we 
>> used the Jupyterlab portal at BNL for a Belle II summer school this year 
>> and it was well-received.  Belle II and its python-based, declarative 
>> analysis code is really a poster child for using jupyter, there is a lot 
>> of focus on this for EIC as well.  I’m sure Eric will mention this too.  I 
>> remember from this year’s HOW workshop that LSST is very interested and 
>> active in using jupyter as analysis portal.
>> 
>>      Cheers
>> 
>>              Paul
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 31, 2019, at 05:02, Alexei Klimentov via Phys-npps-mgmt-l 
>>> <phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for comments/suggestions, I think all of them are good to add, 
>>> especially synergy in HPC, Data Carousel, DDM and CDB, I personally also 
>>> like Chris suggestions about analysis, I assume it will be interesting to 
>>> LSST. BTW, do we have an expert among NP and PP in Kubernetes ?
>>> I’ll try to send you my  slides by beg of the next week for comments
>>> 
>>> Thanks again, Alexei
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 17:53, Jerome LAURET <jlauret AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>    Probably all of the above (or in this case below :-) ).
>>>>    HPC synergies are still possible.
>>>> 
>>>>    It is not clear if there are talk slots (and who would be giving
>>>> such talk) for other activities but as noted by Brett, condition DB is
>>>> a strength developed over many years. I doubt detector simulation is a
>>>> re-usable skill / knowledge across experiments but the toolkit aspect
>>>> could.
>>>> 
>>>> On 2019-10-30 11:25, Alexei Klimentov wrote:
>>>>> I am not sure what should I highlight for STAR (may be again HPC, cloud 
>>>>> computing, data carousel ?),
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>>          ,,,,,
>>>>         ( o o )
>>>>      --m---U---m--
>>>>          Jerome
>>>>       <he-him-his>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Phys-npps-mgmt-l mailing list
>>> Phys-npps-mgmt-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/phys-npps-mgmt-l
>> 
>