sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion
List archive
- From: "dlynch AT bnl.gov" <dlynch AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Sickles, Anne M" <sickles AT illinois.edu>, Gabor David <david AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:56:05 -0500
Hi all,
My 2 cents, we should be able to trace the THP modules back to their production. If THP is not already doing so, they should be tracking each module with a route card so that variations in materials, procedures, assembly techniques, and personnel can be tracked. This is basic QA and not just a good idea but generally a requirement in the QA section of BNL Purchase Orders.
-Don
From: <sphenix-emcal-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of "Sickles, Anne M" <sickles AT illinois.edu>
Date: Friday, February 26, 2016 at 8:16 PM
To: Gabor David <david AT bnl.gov>
Cc: "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot
Date: Friday, February 26, 2016 at 8:16 PM
To: Gabor David <david AT bnl.gov>
Cc: "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot
Hi Dave, John & Gabor,
The Illinois modules are numbered according to the production sequence so, yes, in general we are getting higher density with time. However there are a couple of features. Between module 6 & 7 there was a change in the filling procedure for
the tungsten and you can see a corresponding increase in density. Additionally the final eight Illinois modules were produced with a different batch of tungsten powder from the prior modules and a slightly different mold. These modules were all produced
this week under essentially identical conditions and thus I think the observed density variation is inherent in the (current) procedure. The effect of the tungsten powder batch is something we are looking into in more detail; at this point we can only say
that not all tungsten powder is the same…
For the THP modules the numbers don’t mean anything about the production since the numbers were assigned in Illinois rather than at THP at production time. The density variation is a point of concern, but I don’t have a quantitative number of
the size of density variation we can tolerate. Obviously we can take steps to correct for it or model it with simulation, but we also need to build a density range into our QA criteria for the modules themselves. That is something I hope to understand better
with the test beam.
Best,
Anne
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Gabor David <david AT bnl.gov> wrote:On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Lajoie, John G [PHYSA] wrote:
Hi, John,Hi Vera,
Very nice plot!
The THP points in particular had me wondering if there is a limit to the
variation of the density that you can tolerate? I would expect that a
module-to-module variation in the density (of the absorber) would lead to a
variation in the effective sampling fraction, which could degrade the
effective energy resolution. I suppose if you knew the density of each
module you could make a correction?
wild guess: yes, and two different ways.
1/ have the same density in each module in the simulation,
but at the end correct the visible signal in each tower (such a
"calibration of the simulation output" is not unheard of, actually
in some sense we are doing it even now)
2/ get different densities for different modules in GEANT4
(just kidding; nightmare!)
Maybe a first good question to ask would be to compare
the simulated response in two modules with densities corresponding
to the two ends of the current density distribution.
2 cents :-)
GaborJohn
On 2/26/2016 4:24 PM, Loggins, Vera wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to share the density plot vs. module number that we have
at UIUC. I have plotted this along with THP's numbers.
Have a good weekend,
Vera
--
John Lajoie
Professor of Physics
Iowa State University
(515) 294-6952
lajoie AT iastate.edu
Facebook LinkedIn
Contact me: Skype john.lajoie
--
Gabor David (david AT bnl.gov)
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Physics Department, Bldg 510/c
UPTON NY 11973
Tel: (631)344-3016
FAX: (631)344-3253_______________________________________________
Sphenix-emcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-emcal-l
--------------------------------------------------------------
Anne Sickles
Assistant Professor, Department of Physics
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
[Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Loggins, Vera, 02/26/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot, David Morrison, 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Lajoie, John G [PHYSA], 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Gabor David, 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/26/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot, Lajoie, John G [PHYSA], 02/27/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
dlynch AT bnl.gov, 02/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/29/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot, Craig Woody, 02/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Sickles, Anne M, 02/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] Density plot,
Gabor David, 02/26/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.