sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX EMCal discussion
List archive
- From: "Bailey, Virginia Ruth" <vbailey2 AT illinois.edu>
- To: EdwardOBrien <eobrien AT bnl.gov>, "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:23:33 +0000
Hi Ed,
You are correct that the dp/p component is the beam momentum spread incorporated into the fits. The x-axis for both linearity and resolution plots is the input energy (perhaps it would make more sense to label both the same thing). You are also correct
that the measured energy is the same as the <E>.
I believe you are referring to the plots on the right of slides 4 and 5 (the resolution plots) when comparing the THP and UIUC points. These points depend both on the mean and spread of the energy distributions. The 2 GeV point for THP is quite low due
to low statistics for that run, causing the distribution to be narrow. As you can see on the left, the measured mean energies are close for the THP and UIUC blocks so I would think the difference in the resolution points comes from the energy spread.
Best,
Virginia
From: EdwardOBrien [eobrien AT bnl.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:33 PM To: Bailey, Virginia Ruth; sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov Subject: Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots Hi Virginia,
I have a couple of questions about the plots that I probably should know if I had attended all of the EMCal meetings. All plots show a fit result with a dp/p of 2% component. Is this just the momentum dispersion of the beam that has been incorporated into all fit results? For the plots on p. 3-9 the x axis of the plot on the left is labeled Input Energy and the x-axis on the plot on the right is labeled Energy. What is the difference between Input Energy and Energy? Is the Measured Energy in the y axis label on the left plots the same as the <E> in the formula on the y axis labels of the right plots? If I look at the plots on slides 4 and 5, I see that the UIUC 10deg and THP 10deg data points sit on top of each other everywhere except the 2, 3 and 4 GeV on the left plot. Is that because the width of the reconstructed energy distribution was different in the THP and UIUC modules for those beam energies? In some cases the THP points are above the UIUC points while in other cases they are below. Is there an explanation on how this could be? Thanks. Ed On 10/25/2016 11:27 AM, Bailey, Virginia Ruth wrote:
|
-
[Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 10/25/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 10/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Craig Woody, 10/28/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Sickles, Anne M, 10/29/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots, woody, 10/30/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Sickles, Anne M, 10/29/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Craig Woody, 10/28/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
EdwardOBrien, 10/26/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 10/27/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots, EdwardOBrien, 10/27/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 10/27/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-emcal-l] EMCal Testbeam paper plots,
Bailey, Virginia Ruth, 10/26/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.