sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-physics-l] pCDR 0.99
- From: John Haggerty <haggerty AT bnl.gov>
- To: sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov, "sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-emcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-physics-l] pCDR 0.99
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:54:31 -0400
Hello again,
Thanks to all the people who read, commented on, and corrected the pCDR document, it has come together into a very useful snapshot of our thinking about the sPHENIX detector with some detailed technical descriptions of simulations and prototypes and designs. The one week comment period is now over, and we plan to make a final edit and set of corrections shortly and then make it available to the review committee.
It's not the end, but the beginning of some very serious thinking about how we will build the sPHENIX detector, and probably anyone who contributed to pCDR recognizes better what they can do to design and build a truly world-class second generation RHIC experiment.
On 10/17/15 9:00 AM, John Haggerty wrote:
Hello,
I put version 0.99 of the sPHENIX Pre-Conceptual Design Report on an
Indico page here:
https://indico.bnl.gov/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=1483
(the pCDR link) which should be accessible to PHENIX and non-PHENIX
alike. There is still work going on to complete the document, but the
hard deadline is to have it complete for the review committee two weeks
in advance, on Monday, October 26. PHENIX tradition is a one week
comment period which will be up next Saturday (October 24), but the
sooner comments can be received and acted upon by the many authors and
editors, the better, so if you could make comments and corrections by
Thursday, that will give us more time to finalize the TeX and clean up
any figures that still need cleaning up.
I would like to try crowdsourcing the small grammatical corrections that
take a lot of time in finalizing a document like this from many
authors--if you see small changes in working that are needed, try fixing
them on the Overleaf site itself:
https://www.overleaf.com/2657127qghjbm
This document has really been a collaborative effort, with writing,
editing, figures, simulation, and engineering from a large and diverse
group of people who have come together around this proposal, and it's
gratifying to see it come together. It has always impressed me how
PHENIX comes together to get a job done, and it looks like sPHENIX is
following that example.
--
John Haggerty
email: haggerty AT bnl.gov
cell: 631 741 3358
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] pCDR 0.99,
John Haggerty, 10/17/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
David Morrison, 10/20/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
Jamie Nagle, 10/21/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
Jamie Nagle, 10/21/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
Jamie Nagle, 10/23/2015
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99, David Morrison, 10/23/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
Jamie Nagle, 10/23/2015
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-emcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99, Itaru Nakagawa, 10/21/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
Jamie Nagle, 10/21/2015
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99, David Morrison, 10/21/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
Jamie Nagle, 10/21/2015
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-physics-l] pCDR 0.99, Darren McGlinchey, 10/21/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-physics-l] pCDR 0.99,
John Haggerty, 10/24/2015
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-physics-l] pCDR 0.99, Megan Connors, 10/24/2015
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] [Sphenix-tracking-l] pCDR 0.99,
David Morrison, 10/20/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.