sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
- From: Eric Mannel <mannel AT bnl.gov>
- To: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:59:34 -0500
Ed- FNAL might be able to provide the tiles however, there are a couple of details that would need to be explored:
Uniplast delivers a "final" product, other vendors may not.
While it may not work out for the prototype, it might be useful to
get some concrete numbers for down the road when we have to
justify the costs and help us understand what the issues are. Eric On 1/6/2016 3:26 PM, EdwardOBrien
wrote:
Hi John, John and Edward, I agree that we need to have someone, presumably a collaborator from a Russian institution, visit Uniplast regularly during all future production, even the next prototype round. Can someone answer whether Uniplast can correct the thickness problems prior to completing the the high eta tile production? We should spend some effort to qualify a second tile vendor. Is there any chance that we can do this in time for the Inner HCal prototype to be used in April? If not then I suggest we use a second vendor for a part of the high eta tiles, both Inner and Outer. Since we have ordered the full high eta tile complement from Uniplast, the tiles from a second vendor will result in us having spares in the end. We are already pursuing different production options for the EMCal towers, and will also look at a variety of vendors for the Outer HCal steel and Inner HCal stainless steel. We should do the same for the tiles. Ed On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, John Haggerty wrote:As I said, I'll summarize my e-conversation with Edward about the tile thickness. I forgot that to make these tiles, they had to make some changes to their extruder in order to make wide enough tiles.picture gets a bit cleaner with UNIPLAST. In summary - this is my fault, I was too certain that 2013 production is a good predictor for what we’ll get in 2015. Ignored the fact that UNIPLAST essentially crossed the line - they switched from 19cm wide band extrusion to 25cm wide extrusion. Lot of hardware modifications and no other consumers except us. - large tiles are relatively uniform but with excess thickness of ~0.4mm. 0.2 mm are due to coating (I expected 0.1mm or 0.05mm per layer), 0.2mm is due to excess thickness at the edges (temperature regime which is undercompensated by the slit shape); - small tiles are from tune-up cycles - wide bands but small loads; - not much care of wrap quality on short tiles (large one were made after my visit - wrap quality was probably improved but sill not strictly enforced. There is no problem to bring tiles to the spec (we need to decide if we want 7mm or 7.2mm (coated) thickness. We will also need to decide on wrapping materials - they will set the final tile thickness. PS. If any measurements on tiles are still going - please add the corner to corner dimensions at the inner and at the outer edges of the tile (cylinder radii) in finished state.So I would say the lesson is that we probably have to have someone at Uniplast at least periodically during fabrication who can assess the production before we ship them to BNL or wherever we decide to send them first. We also need to finalize the wrapping, Edward is still interested in Tedlar, although I think we'll have to assess the thickness that we'll end up with before we buy a lot of it. There will be more on measurements later today, I think, from Kenny by way of Abhisek and Megan that will help us understand how to proceed._______________________________________________ Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l -- Eric J. Mannel, Ph.D. Research Engineer Dept of Physics/PHENIX Brookhaven National Laboratory 631/344-7626 (Office) 914/659-3235 (cell) |
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
John Haggerty, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Megan Connors, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Edward Kistenev, 01/06/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue, Megan Connors, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Edward Kistenev, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
EdwardOBrien, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Edward Kistenev, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Rusty Towell, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Edward Kistenev, 01/06/2016
-
Message not available
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue, Edward Kistenev, 01/07/2016
-
Message not available
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Edward Kistenev, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Rusty Towell, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Edward Kistenev, 01/06/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue, Eric Mannel, 01/06/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Tile thickness issue,
Megan Connors, 01/06/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.