sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data
- From: Edouard Kistenev <kistenev AT bnl.gov>
- To: Abhisek Sen <sen.abhisek AT gmail.com>
- Cc: sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:55:31 -0500
Thanks, Abhisek. Any chance that we have dates of the data taking.
Edward
On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Abhisek Sen <sen.abhisek AT gmail.com> wrote:Hi Edward,<calibration_ratio.xlsx>_______________________________________________Here is my log. Can you compare with these?Cheers,AbhisekOn Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:12 AM John Lajoie <lajoie AT iastate.edu> wrote:Hi Edward,
Ugh - this sounds ugly.
Since we have an HCAL meeting this week, it seems like that might be a good time to discuss this as a group? Would it be possible for you to make a few slides with your test results to lead the discussion?
John
On 11/14/2016 9:38 AM, Edouard Kistenev wrote:
_______________________________________________Hi, Megan, Abhisek and everyone, just before the tiles were extracted from t1044 prototype I took few runs with self- and external- cosmic triggers in HInner and HOuter. While HOuter looks reasonably stable between run 2029 (April 11) and now (one tower is different by x2), the changes to mu-peaks in HInner are too random to explain by for example global change in applyied bias. All tiles are already on the desk in HB - I am sure you know how to find those which belong to specific towers and reestablish the ordering - please help - I would like to have a closer look on outliers. The first one to see is #6 (2/1) in HOuter, maybe (0/0 and 2/0) in HInner (first moved up by x1.5 second down by the same factor). We would also need to pay more attention to the gain of electronics - probably need someone to look into preamp gains at least in towers which changed the mu-peaks too much. It is simple - find single pixel value connecting different preamps to the same SiPM (maybe to different inputs on bad preamps if found). Edward _______________________________________________ Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l
Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l
Sphenix-hcal-l mailing list
Sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Edouard Kistenev, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
John Lajoie, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Abhisek Sen, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Edouard Kistenev, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Abhisek Sen, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Edouard Kistenev, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Abhisek Sen, 11/14/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data, Edouard Kistenev, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Abhisek Sen, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Edouard Kistenev, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Abhisek Sen, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Edouard Kistenev, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
Abhisek Sen, 11/14/2016
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data, Megan Connors, 11/14/2016
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] Calibration problems in t1044 HCal data,
John Lajoie, 11/14/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.