sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX HCal discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance
- From: John Lajoie <lajoie AT iastate.edu>
- To: <sphenix-hcal-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:45:11 -0600
Hi Abhisek, Nice poster! Here are some comments: Something that seems to me to be missing is a picture or diagram
of the planned sPHENIX calorimeter system in the early part of the
poster, although you have a lot of words and description. I know
space is limited, but if you could fit a diagram of the detector
or a cross-section of the calorimetry then the reader could
connect that with the picture of the prototype as implemented
later in the poster. Fermilab Test Beam Setup: consider putting an arrow labeled
"beam" on the diagram? HCAL Standalone measurements: You have data and SIM compared on
the diagrams, you should sat something about what SIM is (G4
simulation of test beam detector). Can you remove the electron measurements from the two plots? You're not making use of this for anything, and I am worried that it will be misinterpreted as the sPHENIX combined calorimetry response for electrons by an careless reader. In any case it is an HCAL and your poster is focusing on hadronic response. In the last sentence of the discussion of the resolution plots
you say ""...matches with the simulation satisfying the sPHENIX
physics requirements." The sPHENIX physics requirement is not
that data matches simulation, but that the resolution is
sufficient, and there are no simulations on this plot. Also the
sPHENIX spec is on the combined calorimetry and not the HCAL
alone. I would cut this sentence and use the space above to
discuss the simulations in the context of the 12 and 16GeV
distributions. EMCal + HCAL -> Full sPHENIX Calorimetry Measurements (a suggestion) Your last sentence here should be something like "The performance of the sPHENIX prototype demonstrates the calorimetry design can achieve the sPHENIX specifiaction of better than 100%/sqrt(E) energy resolution for single hadrons."
Regards, On 1/27/2017 5:00 PM, Abhisek Sen
wrote:
Hello,
A draft of the poster is here. Comments and suggestions
will be appreciated.
http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/publish/abhisek/sphenix/QM17poster_abhisek.pdf
http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/WWW/publish/abhisek/sphenix/QM17poster_abhisek.pptx Cheers, Abhisek _______________________________________________ sPHENIX-HCal-l mailing list sPHENIX-HCal-l AT lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-hcal-l Contact me: john.lajoie
|
-
[Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
Abhisek Sen, 01/27/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
John Lajoie, 01/29/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
Abhisek Sen, 01/30/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
John Lajoie, 01/31/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
Abhisek Sen, 01/31/2017
- Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance, John Lajoie, 01/31/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
Abhisek Sen, 01/31/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
John Lajoie, 01/31/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
Abhisek Sen, 01/30/2017
-
Re: [Sphenix-hcal-l] QM17 Poster on HCal Test Beam Performance,
John Lajoie, 01/29/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.