sPHENIX discussion of the superconducting solenoid

["Yip, Kin" <kinyip AT bnl.gov>]

Hello,

 

I’ve updated the interface document in this area :

https://collab.external.bnl.gov/sites/sPHENIX-Magnet/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FsPHENIX%2DMagnet%2FShared%20Documents%2F1008

 

with a new interface document updated by Brian Van Kuik (with a lot of details):

https://collab.external.bnl.gov/sites/sPHENIX-Magnet/Shared%20Documents/1008/2020-4-7%20sPHENIX%20Cryo%20Controls%20Interface%20Requirements.docx

 

There is a translation/decoder of the variables at the end of the document 😊

 

I think there are probably too many alarm in the alarm table and we ought to choose a few that are useful and important (so that sPHENIX shifter or MCR can pay their focus on).

 

Kin

 

From: Van Kuik, Brian <vankuik AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 12:53 PM
To: Marr, Gregory <gmarr AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Tallerico, Thomas N <tallerico AT bnl.gov>; Than, Yatming (Roberto) <ythan AT bnl.gov>; Yip, Kin <kinyip AT bnl.gov>; Jamilkowski, James <jpjamilk AT bnl.gov>; Brown, Kevin A <brownk AT bnl.gov>
Subject: sPhenix: Cryo & Controls/MCR Interface

 

Hi Greg,

 

The development of sPhenix is progressing, from my point-of-view, MCR should be brought into the loop. 

 

As you know sPhenix is going to be superconducting and with that, the normal experimental trip, CAS resets and RHIC resumes model won’t necessarily apply to sPhenix.

 

The document attached is what my first pass at what needs to be shared.

 

What other data & statuses would MCR want to see for their Operational needs? 

 

 

 

Brian van Kuik

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Cryogenics Group

vankuik AT bnl.gov

631-344-4245