Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-physics-l - Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] joint HF/Quarkonium, TG meeting on May 3 (Wed) at 9:30AM ET

sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX discussion of physics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
  • To: "sphenix-hf-Jets-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-hf-jets-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Sphenix-upsilons-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Sphenix-upsilons-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-physics-l] joint HF/Quarkonium, TG meeting on May 3 (Wed) at 9:30AM ET
  • Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 18:08:24 +0000

Here are the minutes from today's meeting.

Tony

Beam use proposal 
--------------------------
Dennis: Can regenerate the previous BUP plots from HF/Q, doing some relabeling. Have updates to the Upsilon plots to include the 3S, and 0-60% comparison with STAR results from Sasha Lebedev.

HF jet z_g: Jin:
Showed projection for statistical precision for soft-drop grooming for b jets.
New plot in slide 6, based on Li, Vitev paper.
Dennis: We should include this in the BUP, making clear it shows statistical power - systematics TBD.
Murad: Would be nice to show this with g->bb_bar included (~ 10% effect).
Decided to stick with this plot as-is.

Jin: Thomas is working on D0/D0_bar separation. BUP21 had a plot of the combined A_N for them. Do we want to try to make separate plots of transverse spin asymmetry for D0 and D0_bar?
Decided it is not clear that we understand things well enough yet.
Murad: BUP21 plot assumes polarization of 0.57. Seems low. Using a polarization of 0.6-0.7 could make a big difference to the uncertainties.

Electron ID: Weihu Ma:
-------------------------------
Showed results of multi-variable-analysis of hadron rejection factor for several ML methods.
Get rejection factors of ~ 200 (factor of 2 increase) by including E(inner HCal)/E(EMCal) and EMCal cluster chisq with E(EMCal)/p.
Need to see how it works with embedding in Hijing events next.
BDT method seems consistently a little better than the others.
Slide 5: Why does BDT look so much better than the others in the left plot on slide 5? Highly expanded x-axis scale.
 
Next meeting: May 18.



From: Anthony Frawley
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 2:02 PM
To: sphenix-hf-Jets-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-hf-jets-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Sphenix-upsilons-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Sphenix-upsilons-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov <sphenix-physics-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Anthony Frawley <afrawley AT fsu.edu>
Subject: joint HF/Quarkonium, TG meeting on May 3 (Wed) at 9:30AM ET
 

Hi Everyone

 

We will hold the next meeting for the joint HF/Quarkonium TG on May 3 (Wed) at 9:30AM ET.


We have the following talks on the agenda:

  • Introduction: co-convenors
  • BUP22 preparation: Dennis Perepilitsa
  • HF jet z_g: Jin Huang
Electron ID update: Weihu Ma

If you have something to present, please contact us.

Please join us via:
https://indico.bnl.gov/event/15481/

Zoom: https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1613938007?pwd=QjYzUnpYQ2xNZWZLSy9qd3Z4dFpzZz09


Best regards 
Jin, Hideki, Tony and Marzia







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page