sPHENIX tracking discussion

[pinkenburg <pinkenburg AT bnl.gov>]

    Hi Joe,
    
    looks good. I would have 2 suggestions from the nitpicking
    department which you are free to not implement.
    
    On slide 9 I think this statement
    
    are ported to ACTS geometry in the background
    
    could be refined. I think "transparently" would be a better choice.
    
    On slide 5 where you introduce the tracking detectors, it might make
    it clearer for the audience to point out that the INTT's purpose is
    also to identify tracks from the current collision since it is the
    only tracking detector which has a short enough integration time.
    
    Chris

On 5/10/2021 11:33 AM, Osborn, Joe wrote:

Hi all,

 

Attached is a draft of my slides for CHEP. My talk is next Monday at 11:10 AM EST, and I have a total time slot of 30 minutes so I’ll aim for 25+5. Any comments/suggestions are welcome.

 

Joe Osborn

 

---------------------------   Joe Osborn, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Associate Oak Ridge National Laboratory osbornjd AT ornl.gov (859)-433-8738

 

_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-tracking-l mailing list
sPHENIX-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l
    
    
-- 
*************************************************************

Christopher H. Pinkenburg	;    pinkenburg AT bnl.gov
				;    http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/~pinkenbu

Brookhaven National Laboratory	;    phone: (631) 344-5692
Physics Department Bldg 510 C	;    fax:   (631) 344-3253
Upton, NY 11973-5000

*************************************************************