sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions
- From: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT cea.fr>
- To: sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:16:17 -0600
Hi Christof,
These numbers do look small indeed (at most 2um)
Last time I looked (a long time ago, in 2020), the residuals where more around 5um (all sizes included) (see plot attached)
I tried to look at the QA plots (e.g. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nbviewer.org/github/sPHENIX-Collaboration/QA-gallery/blob/jenkins-sPHENIX-test-tracking-low-occupancy-qa-2207-test-tracking_Event1000_Sum16/QA-Mvtx.ipynb__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!F75K0bmn-hbMcsFeIvPKt82oxMU5ewYVpTmBqVfZs15PYCyUne7TebreJ2QYw1MQV_iJHQtTALmoj4PlgbsfVLxzMFu42Cm_nWUnQx9Yhg$ ) but we can't read the x axis there ... Not very useful, something that we should fix ...
Hugo
On 6/17/22 01:40, Christof Roland via sPHENIX-tracking-l wrote:
Hi Everybody,
i am in the process of producing the new error parameterizations so we can
swith to TrkrClusterv4.
Looking at the MVTX residuals I see distibutions that are way to narrow, as
far as I understand.
Here is a list of the observed RMS of the residual (cluster phi position -
track phi position) distribution.
There is the residual with respect to the truth track and the reco track as
well as the a selection for cluster width in phi ==1 or bigger than one.
truth layer 0 phisize = 1 RMS: 0.000122
truth layer 0 phisize > 1 RMS: 0.000164
truth layer 1 phisize = 1 RMS: 0.000090
truth layer 1 phisize > 1 RMS: 0.000126
truth layer 2 phisize = 1 RMS: 0.000072
truth layer 2 phisize > 1 RMS: 0.000102
trk layer 0 phisize = 1 RMS: 0.000133
trk layer 0 phisize > 1 RMS: 0.000143
trk layer 1 phisize = 1 RMS: 0.000110
trk layer 1 phisize > 1 RMS: 0.000123
trk layer 2 phisize = 1 RMS: 0.000124
trk layer 2 phisize > 1 RMS: 0.000134
In general we see a residual width fo ~1.2 micron. The error assigned by the
MVTX clusterizer is ~2.6 micron.
How is this possible? the pixel pitch of the MVTX is ~30um and the intrisic
resolution according to ALICE specs should be ~5um.
Especially for phi size = 1 clusters we should see something like
30/sqrt(12) ~ 9um
Does anybody have an idea how to make sense of this?
Thanks
Christof
_______________________________________________
sPHENIX-tracking-l mailing list
sPHENIX-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-tracking-l
Attachment:
mvtx_sigma_rphi.png
Description: PNG image
-
[Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Christof Roland, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Anthony Frawley, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Christof Roland, 06/20/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions, Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 06/20/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Christof Roland, 06/20/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Anthony Frawley, 06/17/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Wierd MVTX residual distributions,
Hugo Pereira Da Costa, 06/17/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.