sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion
List archive
- From: "Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio" <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT lanl.gov>
- To: "sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 20:54:45 +0000
Hi,
following some discussion at the last general meeting and the last software meeting I had a look at the momentum resolution you get when fitting tracks with MVTX, INTT and TPOT only, in TPOT acceptance (which is ~ 5% of the total acceptance in phi) and ignoring
the TPC clusters for the time beeing.
The results are in the slides attached first with the current (over optimistic) TPOT spacial resolution, second with more realistic values.
This assumes that the detectors are perfectly aligned, and that track matching between INTT and MVTX to TPOT works (right now relying essentially on the TPC).
Note: for some reason my current simulations give a slightly worse momentum resolution that what we have in the have in e.g. the QA, when using MVTX, INTT and TPC, but that does not change the conclusions dramatically.
Comments welcome
Hugo
Attachment:
momentum_resolution.pdf
Description: momentum_resolution.pdf
-
[Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 10/07/2022
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Ming Liu, 10/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 10/07/2022
- Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT, Anthony Frawley, 10/07/2022
-
Re: [Sphenix-tracking-l] Momentum resolution in TPOT,
Pereira Da Costa, Hugo Denis Antonio, 10/07/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.