STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Xiaofeng Luo <xfluo.star AT hotmail.com>]

Hi Ashish,

    Thank you for taking into account the suggestions.
    Please find some additional minor suggestions below :

    1. Title : net-partilce -> net-charge and net-kaon.
    2. 2nd Paragraph  : We present the cumulants of net-particle 
distributions from  -> We present the cumulants of net-charge and 
net-kaon distributions from
    3. 2nd Paragraph  : Cumulants and ratios of cumulants of net-kaon, 
and net-charge distributions measured .... -> Cumulants and ratios of 
cumulants measured at mid-rapidity will be presented as a function of 
collision centrality.
            (as net-charge is using eta cut and different pt range 
comparing to net-kaon)

Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng

On 2020/9/21 20:55, apandav wrote:
> Dear Xiaofeng,
>
> Many thanks for your comments and suggestions.
> Please find my replies as follows.
>
> The modified abstract can be found on the link below (after 
> incorporating Hanna's comment as well).
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DAE_HEP_abstract_e2.pdf
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On 2020-09-21 06:11, Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l wrote:
> > Hi Ashish,
> >
> >    Nice abstract.
> >    Please find my suggestions/comments below :
> >    I suggest only present net-charge and net-kaon results in the DAE
> > meeting for the following reasons:
> >
> >     1.  There are still some inconsistency between Run 18 and Run 11
> > 27 GeV net-proton results
> >          For example C4 and C4/C2. The reason for this are still under
> > investigated.
> >          In addition, considering C4 short paper has been submitted to
> > PRL and under review.
> >          This inconsistency may trigger unexpected questions from 
> > referee.
>
> I agree with your suggestions. The abstract is modified and only 
> net-kaon and net-charge results are mentioned.
>
> >      2. net-proton C6 paper with Run 18 27 GeV results are also in GPC
> > and under discussion.
> >          Your results and the ones put into C6 paper may not be
> > identical, within errors they could be consistent
>
> I noticed Toshihiro used an additional cut on |Vz-vpdVz|<5 cm, which I 
> had not. With the exactly same event cuts used the results show good 
> agreement as can be seen from the below link.
>
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/comp_c5_c6.pdf
>
>
> >    Thus, I would suggest only show net-charge and net-kaon results in
> > the DAE meeting.
> >    We can discuss more about this in the high moments focus group 
> > meeting.
>
> The abstract is modified to only include net-kaon and net-charge results.
>
> > Thank you,
> > Best Regards,
> > Xiaofeng
> >
> > On 2020/9/17 14:05, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Ashish Pandav (apandav10 AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a 
> > > review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52110
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l