STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl>]

Hi Grigory and all,

Thanks a lot for a comment.

 

I would like to add that if anyone  plans to use the calibration production to study vertex choice, please wait until the reproduction is done. 

Thanks,

Hanna

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk

PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl

Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:

Warsaw University of Technology

Faculty of Physics

Nuclear Physics Division

Koszykowa 75

Office: 117b (via 115)

00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez Grigory Nigmatkulov <nigmatkulov AT gmail.com> w dniu 26.03.2021, o godz. 15:19:

Hi Hanna,

Just a simple idea from my side. I would propose to use VpdOrDefault. This should work fine for energies > 11.5 GeV.

For 11.5 and below this should be checked because I'm not sure about the VPD efficiency.

Cheers,

Grigory

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 13:14, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear CF Colleagues,

Yesterday during our PWG meeting, we discussed Data production:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/common/production-priorties

As not all group members were connected, I would like to ask you here about group opinion/preference/experience.

The question is about BES-II data production for PicoDst files, whether to use Default or VpdOrDefault vertex selection algorithm?

One can study this with the recent 19.6 GeV calibration production.

Let me know if you have any opinion on this,

Thanks,

Hanna

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk

PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl

Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:

Warsaw University of Technology

Faculty of Physics

Nuclear Physics Division

Koszykowa 75

Office: 117b (via 115)

00-662 Warsaw, Poland

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l