STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Debasish Mallick <dmallick AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Xiaofeng and Hanna,

Thank you very much for signing off and approval.

Thanks again,
With Best Regards,
Debasish



On 2021-11-22 09:27, Debasish Mallick wrote:
> Dear Xiaofeng and Hanna,
>
> This is just a gentle reminder on the abstract.
> Kindly find my replies to earlier suggestions from you.
>
> Since only one week is remaining for the abstract submission deadline, 
> I request
> you to kindly do the needful and approve my abstract.
>
>
> Thank you,
> With Best Regards,
> Debasish
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2021-11-18 19:48, Debasish Mallick via Star-cf-l wrote:
> > Dear Xiaofeng and Hanna,
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > Please find my inline response below.
> > We would request to kindly consider these requests.
> >
> > With Best Regards,
> > Debasish
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021-11-18 12:05, Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l wrote:
> > > Hi Debasish,
> > >
> > >     Nice abstract.
> > >     Please find my comments and suggestions below for you to consider 
> > > :
> > >
> > >     1. Line 9-10, I suggest to change to : "In addition, they are 
> > > also
> > > sensitive to local baryon density fluctuations indued by QCD phase
> > > transition."
> >
> > In this abstract, we try to keep the discussion focused on the
> > particle production mechanism by doing a test of thermal models and
> > coalescence models. We have seen from this measurement and thermal
> > model calculations that deuteron cumulants are very sensitive to the
> > different ensembles in the thermal models. This is one of our prime
> > findings and would be very useful to mention it in the abstract. We
> > would like to request to keep this line.
> >
> > We can add your suggestion regarding the QCD phase transition.
> > However, we think this addition to the text might divert a bit the
> > context of the abstract from the production mechanism.
> >
> >
> >
> > >     2.   Line 11， first systematic measurement -> first measurement
> >
> > We present new measurements on centrality and energy dependence of
> > deuteron cumulants as well as proton-deuteron correlations at nine
> > collision energies from BES-I. These results include necessary
> > corrections and the estimation of measurement associated
> > uncertainties. To give justice to these new set of measurements, we
> > feel it would be good to mention "first systematic measurement"
> > instead of "first measurement". We would request to keep this part as
> > before.
> >
> > >     3.  Line 16,  I suggest to delete " using Time Projection Chamber
> > > (TPC) and Time-of-Flight detectors."
> >
> > I think that it is always good to mention the detectors used for
> > particle identification in the measurement. Also, as we are
> > identifying Deuterons in the extended transverse momentum region of
> > Pt=0.8GeV/c to 4.0GeV/c, it is useful to mention TPC and ToF detectors
> > to convey that we have good PID purity. To remove ambiguity on this
> > aspect, it is helpful to keep this text.
> > I would like to request to keep the mention of detectors.
> >
> > >     4.  Line 19 : I suggest to delete "that incorporates 19 the
> > > coalescence of nucleons close-by in space and momentum to form
> > > deuterons."
> >
> > Since our prime motivation consists of studying production of
> > deuterons via thermal/coalescence scheme, we think we should stress
> > that both the model calculations have been compared to the
> > measurements. Coalescence model calculation is an important result and
> > mentioning this feature (phase-space coalescence of close-by nucleons)
> > of the calculation is very relevant and will make the message clear.
> >
> > >     With those implemented, I sign off.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Xiaofeng
> > >
> > > On 2021/11/14 1:41 PM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:
> > > > Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Debasish Mallick (debasish.mallick AT niser.ac.in) has submitted a 
> > > > material for
> > > > a review, please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/57204
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > > > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-cf-l mailing list
> > Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l