STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>]

Dear Jonathan, I forgot to mention the following reason for the comparison between 

your net-lambda and submitted net-proton fluctuation at the same energy with the 

same dataset. From the comparison, the basic trend is quite similar (although the quite 

different magnitude) with respect to the net-proton results, so that you might be able to 

say the dominant mechanism would be similar including the baryon-conservation etc 

and could also would give an additional confidence of both results... 

Best regards, ShinIchi

On Mar 31, 2022, at 22:51, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Jonathan

Thank you for the nice study and result for your poster. 

I find your poster very good and send you a few comments for a possible improvement. 

In future, you could also try to apply a new purity correction that is proposed by Toshihiro, 

as you might know from : https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06953 

Best regards, ShinIchi

P4: I would include a small inset panel in each of all 7 panels in this page, in order to 

compare the trend with the net-proton data from submitted 3GeV FXT paper that will 

also be shown in Yu Zhang’s talk, where the magnitude is quite different, so that we 

can not overlay the points in your plot, therefore I’m suggesting to add a small inset panel 

in each of 7 plots showing c1~c4 and 3 ratios vs Npart, that can be taken from Yu’s slide 

p12 in his talk. Within this inset panel, you could overlay your points, if you like to. 

P5: Please increase the symbol size especially for the experimental data points as well as 

for the ones from UrQMD at 3GeV. The yellowish (or gold color) is not really visible, maybe 

just because of the size and line width, but I would guess you can not change with line width, 

if it indicates the systematic/statistical errors in the model. (Please also indicate the meaning 

of the line width in the plot.) At least, all the point size can be enlarged, but I would also 

choose some other color like red or dark-red/dark-green etc for UrQMD. 

On Mar 30, 2022, at 15:45, Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU> wrote:

Dear ShinIchi,

You can find my updated poster in the following link:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/58753

Best regards,

Jonathan Ball 

---

From: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 9:05 AM
To: Ball Cap, Jonathan Gonzalo <jballcap AT Central.UH.EDU>
Cc: ShinIchi Esumi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Subject: QM22 poster

 

Dear Jonathan
I has been assigned to review your poster for QM22 by 
the STAR management, but I might have missed your E-mail 
to CF or to STAR mailing list, so please remind me the web 
location of your poster for QM22? Thank you and I’m looking 
tor seeing your nice results. 
Best regards, ShinIchi

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l