STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Ke Mi <mike1996 AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>]

Dear Nu, Hanna and All,

Thank you for the nice comments. I’ve revised the draft accordingly, please find through this link:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60334

Generally, I removed p-p and p-Xi CF sections, and added a particle identification part. The rest part is almost unchanged.

>>Line 33: please define q_inv

Add "$q_{inv}$ = 2$k^{*}$” 

>> Line 34: at 39 GeV -> at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 39 GeV

Done

>>Line 38, the formula 3: I think you have there R_inv not R, and R_inv should be introduced / defined (even if you don’t intend to use R_inv notation, as e.g. we have R introduced instead of R_inv on all figures, it would be good to mention that you mean invariant radius.

Add in L41, R is the invariant radius.

>>Line 40: please define all quantities present in the formula for K0S-K0S

Done

>>F_1(q_inv R) -> F1(q_inv, R)

Done

>>F_2(q_inv R) -> F2(q_inv, R)

Done

>>Line 46 and 47: I think you mean R_inv, not Rm but I think you can simply skip R and mention just radius.

Done, remove “R”

>>Figure 1, description: at 39 GeV -> at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 39 GeV

Done

>>Figure 2, description: at 39 GeV -> at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 39 GeV

Done

>>Linę 53: show -> shows

Remove this part

>>Line 54: it starts to decrease -> it decreases

Remove this part

>>Figurę 3, description: UrQMD plus CRAB -> UrQMD and CRAB as the afterburner introducing femtosopic correlations

Remove this part

>>Line 61: at 3 GeV -> at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 3 GeV

Remove this part

>>Linę 92: plus -> including

We’d like to keep plus. The coalescence procedure was done separately, not included into SMASH model.

>>General Comment: sometimes you mention L-L (line 39, 49, description of the Figure 1_, sometimes Lednicky Model (line 100), please use one notation and make all of them consistent.

Done, keep consistent word “L-L model” which is first defined in the third equation.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Ke

On 25. Jul 2022, at 18:09, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Dear Nu, Ke and All,

Yes, I I agree with Nu. If STAR has new results being prepared for the paper that differ from the preliminary ones, they should not be shown any longer. I understand that it is the case of p-p and p-xi. So please modify your proceedings removing not valid any longer results.

Thanks,

Hanna

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk

PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl

Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:

Warsaw University of Technology

Faculty of Physics

Nuclear Physics Division

Koszykowa 75

Office: 117b (via 115)

00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov> w dniu 25.07.2022, o godz. 11:49:

Hi Ke and All,

Thank you for the updated proceedings.

I have the following suggestions for consideration:
1) Remove Fig. 2 where p-p and p-Xi- correlation functions are shown. This is because these results are obsolete and new results (cannot show here) will replace them in the paper publication;

2) We should add some PID information to demonstrate the quality of the analysis, especially for the new results for p-d and d-d correlation functions.

Hope this is helpful.

Nu

On Jul 25, 2022, at 2:55 AM, Ke Mi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Convenors,

Please find the revise draft through this link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM2022_Proceeding_KeMi_v3.pdf
In this draft, we try to include all results presented at QM2022.

Your further comments and suggestions are welcome.
Thank you.

Best regards,
Ke

On 25. Jul 2022, at 00:09, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Dear Ke,

Meantime, please find my comments to your proceedings. Keep in mind I have commented on the version that is current now. When you will work on new draft, please include my comments regarding p-d and d-d system. Having new draft, I will comment more.

Line 1: this proceedings -> these proceedings

Linę 12: it would be nice to just mention which scenarios you consider: thermal production and / or coalescence

Line 21: density[3] -> density [3]

Somewhere in the Results part, close to the discussion, it would be nice mention possible reasons in the correlation strengths between scenarios including / excluding the coalescence mechanism (e.g. for p-d you see a stronger correlations  with DIRECT (no coalescence) scenarios, while in d-d the coalescence scenarios leads to the stronger correlation effect).
Line 92-94: I would be very careful and avoid the statements that: „Those observations imply that at √sNN = 3GeV Au+Au collisions, deuterons are formed via the nucleon coalescence processes” as you don’t discuss any size dependences. You just take pure SMASH data assuming that the source size simply agrees. If you change your source size, you might get different  interpretation. This conclusion should be left for further investigation. Meantime, I suggest to make your conclusion lighter.

Thanks,
Hanna

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk
PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl
Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:
Warsaw University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Nuclear Physics Division
Koszykowa 75
Office: 117b (via 115)
00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez Ke Mi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 24.07.2022, o godz. 13:51:

Dear Hanna and Takafumi,

Thank you for the suggestion.
We will revise the draft and update soon.

Best regards,
Ke

On 24. Jul 2022, at 19:49, Takafumi Niida <niida AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Ke,

I would focus more on final physics results. For example, I’m not sure if you need Fig. 1 and lines 54-59. If needed, Section 1 and 2 could be combined with some modifications. It may be helpful to make more space if you put Figs. 2 and 3 into one figure, upper and bottom plots, because of the similarity of the figures the captions can be reduced.

Best regards,
Takafumi

On Jul 25, 2022, at 2:30, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl> wrote:

Dear Ke and All,

As Takafumi wrote, as your talk was based on merged abstract, the proceedings should also include other's results.
I understand that in case of p-p results that changed after preliminary labels had been granted, old results should not be considered any longer. With p-p @ 3 GeV we should wait until final publication. However, for other results, we appreciate if you include them in  your proceedings.

Thank you,
Best regards,
Hanna

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk
PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl
Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:
Warsaw University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Nuclear Physics Division
Koszykowa 75
Office: 117b (via 115)
00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez Ke Mi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 24.07.2022, o godz. 13:10:

Dear Hanna and Takafumi,

Thank you for the suggestion.

The main reason is due to the page limitation. We presented many of Femtoscopy results at STAR (baryon CF, meson CF, light nuclei CF..), it’s quite hard to include all of them into 6 page.

Beside, for the ks0-ks0 CF, since Diana has presented them at SQM2022 and HYP, we think it might be much better to discuss ks0-ks0 as well as kch-ks0 in a single proceeding. (The time slot may be very close to QM proceeding). That will help to declare this important physics much more clear. For the p-p CF, since the newest results is quiet different from preliminary one and p-p/p-Xi results have been proposed a paper, so here we did not include them.

Since I did not include strangeness, so I changed the title into “Femtoscopy of proton-deuteron and deuteron-deuteron in Au+Au collisions at #sqrt(sNN) = 3 GeV from RHIC-STAR”. The original title is “Femtoscopy of proton, light nuclei and strangeness from STAR”, I’m sorry about no previous notification about this change.

If needed, we are willing to revise the proceedings, both title and contents.

Your further suggestions are welcome.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Ke

On 24. Jul 2022, at 19:01, Takafumi Niida <niida AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Ke,

I also agree with Hana. Since your talk was based on merged abstract, the proceedings should also include other's results. I understand you have many materials and page limit the proceedings should reflect what was presented in your talk.

Best regards,
Takafumi

On Jul 25, 2022, at 0:03, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Ke,

May I ask why among of many STAR results presented in your talk you discuss only p-d and d-d correlations?
I understand the page limit up to 6 but your proceeding refers to only some part of your presentation..
You even changed the title of your contribution.. which I don’t understand. Please explain what happened as I am confused.

Thanks,
Hanna



Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk
PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl
Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:
Warsaw University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Nuclear Physics Division
Koszykowa 75
Office: 117b (via 115)
00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez Ke Mi via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 24.07.2022, o godz. 06:13:

Dear Xiaofeng,

Thank you for the detailed comments and sign-off, I’ve implemented them and update the draft.
Please find through same link:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60334

Best regards,
Ke

On 24. Jul 2022, at 08:39, Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Ke，

   Nice proceedings.
   Please find my minor suggestions :

   1. Line 73, proton and neutron production -> particle production
   2. Reference 9, the "sNN=" can be removed.
   3. You may add a reference of BES deuteron production at STAR.

   With those implemented, I sign off.

Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng

On 2022/7/19 9:34 PM, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:

Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Ke Mi (mike1996 AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60334

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

--
Xiaofeng Luo
Professor of Physics
College of Physical Science and Technology
Central China Normal University
Luoyu Road 152, Wuhan China
Office Phone #: +86-27-67867500

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l