Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-cf-l - Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Rutik Manikandhan for WWND 2024 submitted for review

star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>
  • To: Rutik Manikandhan <manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov>, STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] STAR presentation by Rutik Manikandhan for WWND 2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:05:13 -0800

Dear Rutik and All,

Here are my suggestions for the draft:
1) slide 10 - last bullet: I do not see the connections with other points. I
suggest remove it;

2) slide 11: It is not clear from the texts if the efficiency is extracted
from embedding or other methods. Please make it clear;

3) slide 13: (i) again, the notion for eta is for different frame, please
make it consistent. Otherwise it will lead to confusion; (ii) plot: for
y-axis, I suggest change the lower limit to something like -0.25;

4) slide 16: (i) 2nd-bullet: the sentence is incomplete. Should be something
like “Calculations from transport model …”; (ii) The meaning of bullet 3,4,5
is unclear. Not sure what do you want to say;

5) slide 18 - 2nd bullet: the sentence is incomplete. Something like “STAR
data from 200 GeV Au+Au collisions …”. The same for the 4th bullet;

6) slide 19: It is redundant with respect to slide 18. I suggest remove it.

7) slide 21 - last bullet: at the end, add “especially at the 3GeV Au+Au
collisions. The effect is not yet fully understood” or something like this.
This means that we are still thinking about the new result. This is th eke
slide of the talk. The UrQMD model is a hadronic transport model. Supposedly,
it works better for low energy collisions where partonic medium may not be
dominant, see Ref. 5 and 6. However, here as one can see that the model
result is totally failed while the model calculations show a reasonable
energy dependence of the pT-correlation at higher collision energies. I do
not understand why so.

8) slide 21 - References: do we need 5 and 6?

That is all for now.

Best regards,

Nu



> On Feb 9, 2024, at 8:51 AM, Rutik Manikandhan <manikandhan.rutik AT gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Nu,
>
> The version is v4 now, and this is the link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/WWND_2024_ver4.pdf
>
> Do let me know if this works for you.
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Rutik Manikandhan
> PhD Candidate, Experimental High Energy Group
> Physics Dept.
> University of Houston
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:47 AM Nu Xu <nxu AT lbl.gov> wrote:
> Dear Rutik,
> Somehow the link to drupal does not work.
> Please fix it asap.
>
> Thank you,
> Nu





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page