star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis
- From: Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl>
- To: "star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:50:18 +0200
Dear Yu,
Thanks for posting materials for the PWGC preview.
As mentioned before, your analysis looks mature and should move forward.
I have a couple of comments to include in your nice preview:
Slide 1: deuteron-\Lambda -> d-\Lambda or deuteron-lambda
Slide 2: the same comment regarding the title
Slide 3: interactions can provide-> interactions provide
Deuteron-\Lambda -> d-\Lambda
Slide 4: it will be helpful if you add cuts/selection criteria not only for events but for tracks and pairs as well
Slide 5: I suggest moving from your backup some content regarding corrections: purity, momentum resolution, contamination from ^3_{\Lambda}H, side-band, and down correction; in the backup, you may leave more details for the potential discussion. Looking at the content of your presentation, you still have time for them, and those corrections are typical for femtoscopy analyses (less for other analyses).
Moreover, it would be good to know how these corrections contribute to the extracted parameters.
More about the L-L approach is also welcome, mainly how you include the separation of spin states.
Slide 6: The same suggestion for other checks that are listed on the botton of your slide.
Moreover, here you mention only the contribution of systematic uncertainties to the data point while they are not less important for the extracted parameters.
More discussion is needed regarding systematic uncertainties included in f0, d0, and R parameters.
Slide 9: I don’t see any systematic uncertainties included in source sizes, please add them.
Y axis: d-\Lambda is not needed (C(k*) is enough)
Slide 10: Please specify what you include: 1\sigma, 2\sigma, etc.
Slide 11: Please add the Bethe formula and explain in more detail how separation energy is estimated here.
Slide 12: You mention that extracted parameters include statistical and systematic uncertainties, but no discussion is provided. Please separate them. It is essential to know how to improve the results if more statistics are included or whether we are restricted with systematics.
Kind regards,
Hanna
Prof. Hanna Zbroszczyk, PhD, DSc, Eng.
E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl
Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)
Address:
Warsaw University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Nuclear Physics Division
Koszykowa 75
Office: 117b (via 115)
00-662 Warsaw, Poland
Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)
Address:
Warsaw University of Technology
Faculty of Physics
Nuclear Physics Division
Koszykowa 75
Office: 117b (via 115)
00-662 Warsaw, Poland
Wiadomość napisana przez Hu, Yu <yuhu AT bnl.gov> w dniu 02.04.2024, o godz. 04:18:Dear Hanna, Nu, and All,As we discussed during the collaboration meeting, please find the updated paper proposal slides for d-Lambda CF measurement.We would like to request a PWGC preview if our material looks ok.Thanks!Best,Yu
-
[Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis,
Hu, Yu, 04/01/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis,
Nu Xu, 04/01/2024
- Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis, Hu, Yu, 04/01/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis,
Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk, 04/04/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis,
Hu, Yu, 04/07/2024
- Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis, Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk, 04/11/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis,
Hu, Yu, 04/07/2024
-
Re: [Star-cf-l] Request PWGC preview for the d-Lambda CF analysis,
Nu Xu, 04/01/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.