STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Shengli,
  Nice abstract, here are my comments -- with these included I sign off.

200 GeV are shown -- > 200 GeV will be shown

A weak system independent v3 has been found -->  A weak system 
dependence of v3 has been observed

for three central small systems --> in the central events of three small 
systems

Comparing with different hydro-model  --> Comparison with different 
hydro-model

It think the hydrodynamic evolution is no the emphasis here. How about 
saying "hydro-model calculations with different assumptions on the 
initial conditions" ?

dominated by sub-nulceon fluctuations --> dominated by sub-nulceon scale 
fluctuations

vn in p+Au is similar to that in p+Pb from LHC --> vn in p+Au at RHIC is 
similar to the same in p+Pb at the LHC

We will also discuss the proposed O+O run at RHIC in future --> In the 
context of our measurement we will also discuss the prospects of the 
proposed O+O run at RHIC

It will supply a direct comparison with LHC O+O results --> It will 
facilitate a direct comparison with the results from an anticipated O+O 
run at the LHC

underlined physics for the anisotropic behavior and initial geometry in 
small system.
-->
underlying physics driving the anisotropic behavior and the role of the 
initial geometry in small collision systems.

Best,
Prithwish



On 2020-09-22 10:20, Shengli Huang via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear Jiangyong,
>      Thanks for the comments. I update the abstract by taking your
> suggestion.
>
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52107
>
> Thanks!
> Shengli
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 8:17 AM Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l
> <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Shengli,
> >
> > The abstract looks good. I think you should mention the additional
> > study
> > you have done since QM, so it does not sounds like a repeat of the
> > QM talk.
> >
> > I would mention
> > 1)  a detailed evaluation of the non-flow and method dependence have
> > been carried out. The results main robust.
> > 2)  comprehensive comparison with recent model calculations has been
> > performed, which provide new material for interpretation.
> > 3)  mention a detailed comparison with LHC has been done for various
> > systems and provide motivation for O+O runs.
> > 4) anything you should say about the c2{4} measurement?
> >
> > Jiangyong
> >
> > On 9/16/20 8:28 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Shengli Huang (shengli.huang AT stonybrook.edu) has submitted a
> > material for a
> > > review, please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52107
> > >
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l