STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Chun-Jian Zhang <chun-jian.zhang AT stonybrook.edu>]

Dear Prithwish,

Hello. Thank you for your nice comments. 

I updated my slides based on your nice suggestions. Please find it in https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DNP_STAR_chunjianzhang_v4.pdf

Thank you. Your nice suggestions are really appreciated. 

Best regards 

Chunjian 

On Oct 23, 2020, at 8:43 PM, Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Chunjiang,
 Nice slides, actually you already have included many comments from my side during the approval of your poster. I have a few more comments on your talk -- with the following included I sign off.

General comment: I suggest you make the following change everywhere.
"IP-Glasma-Hydro"-->"IP-Glasma+Hydro"

slide#3:
"used a baseline"
-->
"used as baseline"

slide#4:
small typo and hard to see but pls. correct it:
< ( p_T > ) --> < ( p_T) >

slide#5:
"Track efficiency is corrected from"
-->
"Tracking efficiency is estimated from"
or
"Tracking efficiency correction applied using"

slide#6:
"After adding the statistical fluctuations"
-->
"After incorporating the statistical fluctuations due to finite multiplicity"

slide#6:
I am confused by the table, the label is "TPC centrality" and then you quote the number for slope and in percent?

slide#8:
"they are consistent in"
-->
"they are consistent for"

slide#8:
"indicating the deformation"
-->
"indicating the effect of deformation"

slide#9:
"An hierarchy behavior"
-->
"A hierarchical behavior"

slide#9:
You can confirm from Bjoern about the proper citation but I think it's:
"private calculation provided by Bjoern Schenke"
-->
"private communication, Schenke et. al. (based on Phys. Rev. C 102, (2020) 044905)"

slide#10 title and backup slide title:
"Pearson coefficient \rho(vn^2,[pT]) is not affected by non-flow"
I don't think this is right.

How about:
"Pearson coefficient \rho(vn^2,[pT]) and effects of non-flow"


slide#10 an backup slide 13:

I don't think this statement is true :
"Standard method is consistent with subevent methods."

How about
"Standard method is consistent with subevent methods at high N_ch"

slide#11:
I think showing two plots of just \rho(v2,pT) side-by-side for two different ranges of pT would be better.


conclusion slide:

"Mean pT fluctuation is also intriguing to study nuclear deformation"
-->
"Study of mean pT fluctuation is also an intriguing possibility to probe nuclear deformation"

"Precise model comparison"
-->
"Precise data-model comparison"

"collision"
-->
"collisions"


Remove backup slide#14


Best,
Prithwish



























On 2020-10-21 23:42, Chun-Jian Zhang via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear Shinlchi,
Hello. Thank you for your nice comments.
I update my slides based on your nice suggestions. Please find in
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/dnp2020/study-uranium-nuclei-deformation-flow-mean-transverse-momentum-correlation-s-0
I also upload my requesting preliminary plot in
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/chunjian/dnp-preliminary-plots
Thank you. Your nice suggestions are really appreciated. I am looking
forward to your next comments.
Best regards,
Chunjian

On Oct 17, 2020, at 11:09 PM, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Chunjiang (and Niseem)
After you prepare the preliminary summary page with all your
preliminary plots to be linked
at special drupal area for the preliminary location with necessary
information at :

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/bulk-correlations/bulkcorr-preliminary-summary

then I would approve your talk.
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Oct 18, 2020, at 11:24, ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Chunjiang (and Niseem)
I sing-off your nice talk with some comments.
P2: You could choose some other (or additional) v2 comparison
between AuAu and UU,
which would show more global and general trend not just the
ultra-central collisions, first?
(Also to Niseem) Please have a comparison plot between you and
Niseem with the
same data set 200GeV AuAu, one with your own choice of analysis cut
(especially for
delta_eta and sub-event cuts on covariance and two variances) as
well as another one
with a common set of eta_gap and sub-event cuts for both of the
analysis.
Best regards, ShinIchi
On Oct 15, 2020, at 0:50, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
ChunJian Zhang (zhangchunjian AT sinap.ac.cn) has submitted a material
for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/52365
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l