STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[Prithwish Tribedy <ptribedy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Shaowei,
  The abstract is already in a good shape, here are a few comments with 
these included I sign off.

line 5,6:
"They are established during the early stage of the system evolution"
-->
"They are sensitive to dynamics of the early stages of the system 
evolution"

Remove "(beam energy of 3.85 GeV/u)"

This sentence need some modification:
"At this collision energy, we observe strong and positive directed flow 
for kaons, φ-meson and baryon, and negative elliptic flow at 
mid-rapidity for all particles."

"we observe strong and positive directed flow for"
-->
"we observe strong and positive directed flow at positive rapidity"
or you can say:
"we observe strong and positive slope of directed flow with rapidity 
(dv1/dy)"

"for √s_NN > 7.7 GeV"
-->
"for energies above √s_NN = 7.7 GeV"

"transport model calculations using"
Please add name of the transport model (UrQMD?).

"both modes of cascade and mean-field"
-->
"both cascade and mean-field modes"

"Our analysis indicate"
-->
"Our analysis indicates"

"nucleonic interactions dominate the dynamics"
This is statement kind of looks like out-of-place. Is the change of the 
sign of  dv1/dy enough to make this statement? To strengthen this can we 
say something like NCQ scaling fails in the previous line? Say something 
like: "We also observe that NCQ scaling for v_2, that holds at higher 
energies at RHIC, is absent at 3 GeV".

Best,
Prithwish








On 2021-02-01 00:25, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Shaowei Lan (shaoweilan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for 
> a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53540
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l