STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

["Shaowei Lan" <shaoweilan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn>]

Dear ShinIchi,

Thank you for your comment and for pointing out this.

I think we will show the differential results of v1/v2 as a function of pT and rapidity 

And we will list the pT and rapidity region,  once we show the integral results.

Thanks,

Shaowei

 

 

------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "ShinIchi Esumi via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Date:  Wed, Feb 3, 2021 07:50 PM

To:  "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Subject:  Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shaowei Lan for CPOD March Meeting 2021 submitted for review

 

Dear Shaowei

I find your abstract very nice and like to sing off with a minor comment, where

positive-/negative-ness of v1/v2 are flipped with pT and rapidity at these energies,

which might become visible especially only when we can use huge statistics compared

to the old SPS/AGS dataset, that you might like to keep in mind before making a

definite statement...

Best regards, ShinIchi

2021/02/04 0:17、Shaowei Lan via Star-fcv-l <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:

Dear Jiangyong,

Thank you for your comments and suggestions.

I have implemented the changes.

Please find the updated version at this link:  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53540

Thanks,

Shaowei

implemented implemented

 

 

------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "Jiangyong Jia via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Date:  Wed, Feb 3, 2021 06:02 AM

To:  "star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Subject:  Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shaowei Lan for CPOD March Meeting 2021 submitted for review

 

Hi, Shaowei,

A few comments on your nice abstract

1) I suggest to combine the two paragraph into one.

2) suggest delete: this is an important part of ...

3) "strong and positive slope"-->"positive slope

4) L14: These results are different from those for energies above 7.7 GeV, and could be consistent with a change in ..

Jiangyong

On 2/2/21 11:32 PM, Shaowei Lan via Star-fcv-l wrote:

Dear Prithwish,

Thank you for your comments.

I have implemented all of your comments.

Please find the updated version at the same link:L

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53540

Thanks and best regards,

Shaowei

 

 

------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Date:  Tue, Feb 2, 2021 07:22 AM

To:  "webmaster"<webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG"<star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>;

Subject:  Re: [Star-fcv-l] STAR presentation by Shaowei Lan for CPOD March Meeting 2021 submitted for review

 

Hello Shaowei,
   The abstract is already in a good shape, here are a few comments with
these included I sign off.

line 5,6:
"They are established during the early stage of the system evolution"
-->
"They are sensitive to dynamics of the early stages of the system
evolution"

Remove "(beam energy of 3.85 GeV/u)"

This sentence need some modification:
"At this collision energy, we observe strong and positive directed flow
for kaons, φ-meson and baryon, and negative elliptic flow at
mid-rapidity for all particles."

"we observe strong and positive directed flow for"
-->
"we observe strong and positive directed flow at positive rapidity"
or you can say:
"we observe strong and positive slope of directed flow with rapidity
(dv1/dy)"

"for √s_NN > 7.7 GeV"
-->
"for energies above √s_NN = 7.7 GeV"

"transport model calculations using"
Please add name of the transport model (UrQMD?).

"both modes of cascade and mean-field"
-->
"both cascade and mean-field modes"

"Our analysis indicate"
-->
"Our analysis indicates"

"nucleonic interactions dominate the dynamics"
This is statement kind of looks like out-of-place. Is the change of the
sign of  dv1/dy enough to make this statement? To strengthen this can we
say something like NCQ scaling fails in the previous line? Say something
like: "We also observe that NCQ scaling for v_2, that holds at higher
energies at RHIC, is absent at 3 GeV".

Best,
Prithwish








On 2021-02-01 00:25, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Shaowei Lan (shaoweilan AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for
> a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/53540
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l

_______________________________________________
Star-fcv-l mailing list
Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l